Robust Parental Preferences in Mental Health Screening in Youth From a Multinational Online Survey
Kass, M. C.; Alexander, L.; Moskowitz, K.; James, N.; Salum, G. A.; Leventhal, B.; Merikangas, K.; Milham, M. P.
Show abstract
ImportanceScreening youth for mental disorders may assist in prevention, promote early identification, and reduce related lifetime impairment and distress. ObjectiveThe goal was to survey parents about their comfort and preferences for pediatric mental health screening, as well as factors associated with these preferences. DesignThe online survey was available July 11-14, 2021 on Prolific Academic. Analyses were conducted from November 2021 to November 2022. SettingOnline survey. ParticipantsThe survey was administered to English-speaking parents with at least one 5-21-year old child at home. The sample included 972 parents, aged 21 and older, from the United States (n=265), United Kingdom (n=282), Canada (n=171), and Other Countries (n=254). Exposure(s)None. Main Outcome(s)/Measure(s)Parental preferences regarding the screening content, implementation preferences, and screener reviewing preferences of pediatric mental health screening were assessed in a novel survey. Mixed effects logistic models were employed to evaluate factors that influence parental comfort levels. ResultsParents, aged 21 to 65 (M=39.4; 62.3% female), supported annual mental health screening for their child and preferred reviewing the screening results with professional staff (e.g., physicians). Parents preferred parent-report over child self-reports, though they were generally comfortable with both options. Despite slight variations based on country of residence, screening topic, and childs age, parents were generally comfortable discussing all 21 topics. The greatest comfort was with sleep problems; the least comfort was with firearms, gender identity, suicidality, and substance use/abuse. Conclusions/RelevanceOur data indicated that parents support annual parent- and child self-report mental health screening in primary care settings, but comfort levels differ according to various factors, such as screening topic. Parents preferred screening to occur in the healthcare office and to discuss screening results with professional staff. In addition to parental need for expert guidance, the growing awareness of child mental health needs highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns early via regular mental health screenings. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are parents attitudes towards pediatric mental health screening in primary care settings? FindingsThe vast majority of parents surveyed online (N=972) expressed comfort with the screening of children for mental health concerns in the primary care setting. Variations in comfort were noted in relation to age of child and topics included. Parents expressed a preference for parent report over child report, as well as for reviewing screening results with professional medical staff. These findings were robust to the country of residence (e.g., United States, Canada, United Kingdom). MeaningOur findings document parental preferences that should be incorporated to enhance the feasibility of mental health screening in primary care settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 94%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 93%
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 92%
- “ A Man Never Cries ”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Gender Differences in Depression and Alcohol Use in Moshi, Tanzania 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource 95%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 94%
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.