Back

Performance of a winter wheat composite cross population in two temperate agroforestry systems: a case study

Vaccaro, C.; Mascher, F.; Six, J.; Schob, C.

2023-02-08 plant biology
10.1101/2023.02.07.527524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In agroforestry systems (AFS), where environmental conditions are highly variable at small spatial scales, the use of uniform genetic material of a single cultivar commonly grown in monoculture cropping might not be optimal. However, the use of composite cross populations (CCPs) that contain an inherent genetic variability might be a promising approach to match the environmental variability created by trees in AFS. In this experimental trial, the performance of a CCP ( CC-2k) of winter wheat was compared to a commercial variety ( Wiwa) in a split-plot design in two AFS (Feusisberg, Wollerau) in Central Switzerland. The factor variety (p < 0.05) and the interactions of site and distance to tree (p < 0.05) and site and variety (p < 0.05) significantly affected wheat yield at the plot level. CC-2k and Wiwa yield (across all distances) amounted to 1.9 {+/-} 0.7 Mg ha-1 and 2.0 {+/-} 0.8 Mg ha-1, respectively, in Feusisberg and to 1.9 {+/-} 0.9 Mg ha-1 and 0.7 {+/-} 0.4 Mg ha-1, respectively, in Wollerau. Wiwa had a higher protein, Fe and Ca content than CC-2k. Therefore, while the CC-2k outperformed the commercial organic variety Wiwa in terms of yield in one of the two AFS, Wiwa outperformed CC-2k in terms of quality. The composite cross population might be better adapted to the heterogenous environment of agroforestry systems but fails to reach the high-quality product of modern elite cultivars. Further improvements in terms of quality might make CCPs highly interesting for diversified agricultural systems with larger environmental heterogeneity than common monoculture cropping systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.