Initial Heart Rate Score Predicts New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Pacemaker Patients
Hayashi, K.; Abe, H.; Olshansky, B.; Sharma, A.; Jones, P. W.; Wold, N.; Perschbacher, D.; Kohno, R.; Richards, M.; Wilkoff, B. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundHeart Rate Score (HRSc), the percent of all atrial paced and sensed event in the largest 10 bpm rate histogram bin of a pacemaker, predicts survival in patients with cardiac devices. No correlation between HRSc and development of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported. ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between pacemaker post-implantation HRSc and newly-developed AF incidence. MethodsPatients with dual-chamber pacemakers, implanted 2013-2017, with ALTITIUDE remote monitoring data with [≥]600,000 beats of histogram data collected at baseline were included (N=34,543). HRSc was determined from the post-implantation histogram data during the initial 3 months. Patients were excluded if they had AF, defined as atrial high-rate episodes >5 minutes or >1% of right atrial beats >170 bpm during the initial 3-months post-implantation. New AF, after the baseline period, was defined by each of the following: >1%, >10% or >25% of atrial beats >170 bpm or Atrial Tachycardia Response (ATR) events >24 hr. ResultsPatients were followed a median of 2.8 (1.0-4.0) years. Patients with initial HRSc[≥]70% were older, had higher %RA pacing, had lower %RV pacing and were more likely programmed with rate-response vs subjects with HRSc<70%. The incidence of AF increased in proportion to HRSc (Log-Rank P-value <0.001); results were insensitive to AF definition. Initial HRSc (HR:1.07, 95% CI:1.05-1.09; P<0.0001) independently predicted AF after adjusting for age, gender, % RV pacing and rate-response programming. The %RA pacing and initial HRSc correlated. ConclusionHRSc predicts subsequent AF independent of well-known risk factors in pacemaker patients.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 99%
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 97%
- Right bundle branch pacing: criteria, characteristics and outcomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 97%
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 95%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atrial functional substrates for the prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation 97%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 94%
- Sex-Related Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves: Insights from the OPERA-TAVI Registry 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 97%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 93%
- Automatic Detection of Cardiac Conditions from Photos of Electrocardiogram (ECG) Captured by Smartphones 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes: The Impact Of Functional Mapping In Chagas Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Peri-Procedural Intravascular Hemolysis during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparison of Pulsed-Field with Radiofrequency Ablation 94%
- Multicenter analysis of atrioesophageal fistula rates before and after adoption of active esophageal cooling during atrial fibrillation ablation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.