Back

Use of wastewater metrics to track COVID-19 in the U.S.: a national time-series analysis over the first three quarters of 2022

Varkila, M.; Montez-Rath, M.; Salomon, J.; Yu, X.; Block, G.; Owens, D.; Chertow, G.; Parsonnet, J.; Anand, S.

2023-02-08 public and global health
10.1101/2023.02.06.23285542 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWidespread use of at-home COVID-19 tests hampers determination of community COVID-19 incidence. Using nationwide data available through the US National Wastewater Surveillance System, we examined the performance of two wastewater metrics in predicting high case and hospitalizations rates both before and after widespread use of at-home tests. MethodsWe performed area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (AUC) for two wastewater metrics--viral concentration relative to the peak of January 2022 ("wastewater percentile") and 15-day percent change in SARS-CoV-2 ("percent change"). Dichotomized reported cases ([&ge;] 200 or <200 cases per 100,000) and new hospitalizations ([&ge;] 10 or <10 per 100,000) were our dependent variables, stratified by calendar quarter. Using logistic regression, we assessed the performance of combining wastewater metrics. ResultsAmong 268 counties across 22 states, wastewater percentile detected high reported case and hospitalizations rates in the first quarter of 2022 (AUC 0.95 and 0.86 respectively) whereas the percent change did not (AUC 0.54 and 0.49 respectively). A wastewater percentile of 51% maximized sensitivity (0.93) and specificity (0.82) for detecting high case rates. A model inclusive of both metrics performed no better than using wastewater percentile alone. The predictive capability of wastewater percentile declined over time (AUC 0.84 and 0.72 for cases for second and third quarters of 2022). ConclusionNationwide, county wastewater levels above 51% relative to the historic peak predicted high COVID rates and hospitalization in the first quarter of 2022, but performed less well in subsequent quarters. Decline over time in predictive performance of this metric likely reflects underreporting of cases, reduced testing, and possibly lower virulence of infection due to vaccines and treatments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
4
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
7
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
20
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
21
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%