Back

Neural and visual processing of social gaze cueing in typical and ASD adults

Parker, T. C.; Zhang, X.; Noah, J. A.; Tiede, M.; Scassellati, B.; Kelley, M.; McPartland, J.; Hirsch, J.

2023-02-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.01.30.23284243
Show abstract

Atypical eye gaze in joint attention is a clinical characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite this documented symptom, neural processing of joint attention tasks in real-life social interactions is not understood. To address this knowledge gap, functional-near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and eye-tracking data were acquired simultaneously as ASD and typically developed (TD) individuals engaged in a gaze-directed joint attention task with a live human and robot partner. We test the hypothesis that face processing deficits in ASD are greater for interactive faces than for simulated (robot) faces. Consistent with prior findings, neural responses during human gaze cueing modulated by face visual dwell time resulted in increased activity of ventral frontal regions in ASD and dorsal parietal systems in TD participants. Hypoactivity of the right dorsal parietal area during live human gaze cueing was correlated with autism spectrum symptom severity: Brief Observations of Symptoms of Autism (BOSA) scores (r = -0.86). Contrarily, neural activity in response to robot gaze cueing modulated by visual acquisition factors activated dorsal parietal systems in ASD, and this neural activity was not related to autism symptom severity (r = 0.06). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that altered encoding of incoming facial information to the dorsal parietal cortex is specific to live human faces in ASD. These findings open new directions for understanding joint attention difficulties in ASD by providing a connection between superior parietal lobule activity and live interaction with human faces. Lay SummaryLittle is known about why it is so difficult for autistic individuals to make eye contact with other people. We find that in a live face-to-face viewing task with a robot, the brains of autistic participants were similar to typical participants but not when the partner was a live human. Findings suggest that difficulties in real-life social situations for autistic individuals may be specific to difficulties with live social interaction rather than general face gaze.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Autism
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
15.8%
2
Autism Research
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
7.8%
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
7.8%
5
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 3%
5.5%
6
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 49%
3.0%
8
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 79%
2.9%
9
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
based on 18 papers
Top 0.5%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
11
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
based on 23 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
13
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Biological Psychiatry
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
15
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Schizophrenia Bulletin
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 9%
1.4%
19
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
21
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Cerebral Cortex
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Schizophrenia
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Clinical Neurophysiology
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%