Back

Biosimilarity of GBPD002 compared with Eprex(R) through clinical evaluation in human

Nag, K.; Mohiuddin, M.; Mahtab, M. A.; Bachar, S. C.; Rahim, M. A.; Uddin, M. H.; Kumar, S.; Khan, M. M. R.; Sarker, M. E. H.; Chowdhury, M. M. R.; Roy, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Biswas, B. K.; Bappi, M. E. H.; Roy, R.; Barman, U.; Sultana, N.

2023-01-31 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2023.01.29.23285155
Show abstract

BackgroundThe biosimilarity for erythropoietin (EPO) functionality of GBPD002 (test candidate) and Eprex(R) (comparator) has been evaluated by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following subcutaneous injection. MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blinded, two-sequence, crossover clinical trial. Subjects were randomly assigned and received a dose (4,000 IU) of either the test or comparator EPO, and received the alternative formulations after 4-weeks of washout period. ResultsThe PK parameters, viz., maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf), were calculated with the serum EPO concentrations from blood samples and were found comparable for both formulations. The geometric mean ratios (at 90% CI) of the Cmax and AUCinf were 0.89 and 1.16, respectively, which were within the regulatory range of 0.80 - 1.25. The time-matched serum EPO concentrations and PD markers (reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and red blood cell) denoted a counterclockwise hysteresis, suggesting a time delay between the observed concentration and the response. ANOVA-derived P-values (>0.05) for the effectors clearly revealed the similarity between effects on PD markers for the test and comparator drugs. Both formulations were found tolerated well, and anti-drug antibodies were not observed. ConclusionsThus, the two formulations are projected to be used interchangeably in clinical settings.

Matching journals

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.2%
110× avg
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.1%
101× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 45%
11.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 1.0%
13× avg
5
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
85× avg
6
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 27 published papers
Top 0.5%
32× avg
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 36%
5.1%
8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
American Society for Microbiology · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.2%
45× avg
9
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 6%
4.3× avg
10
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
42× avg
11
Trials
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 24 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
12
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 8%
3.3× avg
13
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
14
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 5%
4.9× avg
15
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
16
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
17
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
5.8× avg
18
Aging
Impact Journals, LLC · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
8.4× avg
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
20
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 11%
2.2× avg
21
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
22
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 5%
3.9× avg
23
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · based on 100 published papers
Top 12%
1.6× avg
25
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
7.4× avg