Back

Carotenoid retention during post-harvest storage of Capsicum annuum: the role of the fruit surface structure.

Holden, A. C.; Cohen, H.; Rickett, D. V.; Aharoni, A.; Fraser, P. D.

2023-01-28 plant biology
10.1101/2023.01.27.525890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Degradation of carotenoids in food crops during post-harvest storage results in major economic and nutritional losses. In this study, a pepper (Capsicum annuum) panel for post-harvest carotenoid retention was studied to elucidate underlying mechanisms associated with this commercial trait of interest. Quantitative determination of carotenoid pigments and concurrent cellular analysis indicated that those pepper fruit with thicker lipid exocarp layers and smooth surfaces, following post-harvest drying and storage, possessed increased carotenoid retention. Total cutin monomer content increased in high carotenoid retention fruits and sub-epidermal cutin deposits were responsible for the difference in exocarp thickness. Cutin biosynthesis and cuticle precursor transport genes were differentially expressed between high and low carotenoid retention genotypes, and this supports the finding that fruit cuticle biosynthesis is associated with carotenoid retention. Carotenoids were located within cells embedded within the sub-epidermal cutin layer, and these carotenoids were protected from degradation due to the lack of permeability of the fruit surface to reactive oxygen species, and their precursors. The identification of a novel role for the pepper fruit surface in protecting against carotenoid degradation serves as an important discovery for the function of the fruit cuticle and provides an exploitable resource to enhance fruit quality. Highlight statementCarotenoid pigments in Chilli pepper confer post-harvest colour and nutritional quality. Analysis of diverse commercial genotypes indicates the involvement of the fruit surface in carotenoid retention

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
3
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
21
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
22
Quantitative Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
24
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
27
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%