Back

Backup transcription factor binding sites protect human genes from mutations in the promoter

Brown, J. C.

2023-01-27 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.01.27.525856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study was designed to test the idea that human gene promoters have evolved to be resistant to the effects of mutations in their primary function, the control of gene expression. It is proposed that the transcription factor/transcription factor binding site (TF/TFBS) pair having the greatest effect on control of a gene is the one with the highest abundance in the promoter. Other pairs would have the same effect on gene expression and would predominate in the event of a mutation in the most abundant pair. It is expected that the overall promoter architecture proposed here will be highly resistant to mutagenic change that would otherwise affect expression of the gene. The idea was tested beginning with a database of 42 human genes highly specific for expression in brain. For each gene, information was accumulated about its expression level and about the TFBS occupancy of the five most abundant TF/TFBS pairs. Expression level was then plotted against TFBS occupancy separately for each of the five pairs, and the plots were compared with each other. The plots were found to be similar, and the results were interpreted to indicate that the TFBS occupancy ranks evolved to yield the same effect on gene expression level with multiple ranks able to function in the event of mutation in another. A similar analysis was conducted with a database of 31 human liver specific genes, and the overall result was found to be the same. Backup TFBS occupancy ranks were interpreted to be present in both brain and liver specific genes. Finally, the TFBSs in the brain specific and liver specific gene populations were compared with each other with the goal of identifying any brain selective or liver selective TFBSs. Of the 89 TFBSs in the pooled population, 58 were found only in brain specific but not liver specific genes, 8 only in liver specific but not brain specific genes and 23 were found in both brain and liver specific genes. The results were interpreted to emphasize the large number of TFBS in brain specific but not liver specific genes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
BMC Genomic Data
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
8
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Molecular and Cellular Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
DNA Repair
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%