Back

Niche conservatism in a generalist felid: low differentiation of the climatic niche among subspecies of the leopard (Panthera pardus)

Leedham, S.; Paijmans, J. L. A.; Manica, A.; Leonardi, M.

2023-01-27 ecology
10.1101/2023.01.26.525491 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimSpecies distribution modelling can be used to reveal if the ecology of a species varies across its range, to investigate if range expansions entailed niche shifts, and to help assess ecological differentiation: the answers to such questions are vital for effective conservation. The leopard (Panthera pardus spp.) is a generalist species composed of one African and eight Asian subspecies, reflecting dispersal from an ancestral African range. This study uses species distribution models to compare the niches of leopard subspecies, to investigate if they conserved their niches when moving into new territories or adapted to local conditions and shifted niche. LocationAfrica and Eurasia MethodsWe assembled a database of P. pardus spp. presences. We then associated them with bioclimatic variables to identify which are relevant in predicting the distribution of the leopard. We then constructed a species distribution model and compared the distribution predicted from models based on presences from all subspecies versus the ones built only using African leopards. Finally, we used multivariate analysis to visualise the niche occupied by each subspecies in the climate space, and to compare niche overlaps to assess ecological differentiation. ResultsNiche comparisons and model predictions suggest a general lack of niche separation between all subspecies. Most Asian subspecies have overlapping niches and occupy subsets of the niche of the African leopard. Nevertheless, we found the Persian leopard Panthera pardus saxicolor to have the most distinct niche, giving some evidence for niche expansion in more Northern Asian subspecies. Main conclusionsThese results suggest little ecological differentiation among leopard subspecies and a lack of adaptation to novel climates after dispersal from Africa. This finding complements recent genetic studies in implying that the taxonomy of Asian leopards may not reflect biological differentiation, an issue that is important to resolve due to its relevance for the conservation of the species.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
18
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
19
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
30
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%