The Effects of Expectations and Worries on the Experience of COVID-19 Symptoms
Akintola, T.; Chung, J.; Atlas, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has been shown to have profound effects on both mental and physical health. Distress and widespread uncertainty about global events and personal risk are associated with increased worry and negative expectations that impact physical health. Thus, the current pandemic poses a possibility for the experience of nocebo effects. ObjectiveTo evaluate the likelihood of nocebo-induced COVID-19 symptoms in a US sample. MethodsAn online study on the mental health impact of COVID-19 asked participants to complete a set of biweekly surveys over a 6-month period between April 2020 and May 2021. We focus on responses from 3,027 individuals who reported never testing positive for COVID-19. We assessed the association between two types of worry and self-reported symptoms of COVID-19. We used multi-level models to examine variations across and within participants over time. We further investigated the effects of pre-existing health conditions and mental health status. ResultsThere was a positive association between symptoms and both general (b= 2.56, p<0.01) and personal worry (b=2.77, p<0.01). However, worry reported at one timepoint was not specifically associated with symptoms reported two weeks later (p = 0.63, p=0.56). We also found that a greater number of prior clinical comorbidities and greater mental health burden were significant predictors of symptom reporting. ConclusionsThese results suggest that increased worries during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with greater symptoms. Further studies investigating worry and symptoms in populations with confirmed negative COVID-19 tests or isolated populations will be needed to isolate the occurrence of true nocebo effects during the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 93%
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire as a marker of low socioeconomic status and inequity 92%
- Conspiratorial thinking in a 50-state survey of American adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 93%
- Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Vibroacoustically-augmented Breath-focused Mindfulness for Dissociation: Targeting Interoception and Attention 92%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does symptom perception after negative affect induction differ between physically ill and healthy individuals? An experimental study within SOMA.CK 92%
- Discernment of Mediator and Outcome Measurement in the PACE trial 91%
- A Pattern-Based Heart Rate Variability Approach in Somatic Symptom Disorder: Evidence from the SOMA.SSD Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in COVID-19 Pandemic-Induced Lifestyle Stressors and Predicts Future Mental Health in Adults and Children in the US and UK 92%
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 92%
- Mental health, gender, and care-seeking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: An exploratory study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.