Back

Whole exome sequencing and replication for breast cancer among Hispanic/Latino women identifies FANCM as a susceptibility gene for estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer.

Nierenberg, J. L.; Adamson, A. W.; Hu, D.; Huntsman, S.; Patrick, C.; Li, M.; Steele, L.; Tong, B.; Shieh, Y.; Fejerman, L.; Gruber, S. B.; Haiman, C. A.; John, E. M.; Kushi, L. H.; Torres-Mejia, G.; Ricker, C.; Weitzel, J. N.; Ziv, E.; Neuhausen, S. L.

2023-01-28 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.01.25.23284924 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionBreast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers globally. Genetic testing can facilitate screening and risk-reducing recommendations, and inform use of targeted treatments. However, genes included in testing panels are from studies of European-ancestry participants. We sequenced Hispanic/Latina (H/L) women to identify BC susceptibility genes. MethodsWe conducted a pooled BC case-control analysis in H/L women from the San Francisco Bay area, Los Angeles County, and Mexico (4,178 cases and 4,344 controls). Whole exome sequencing was conducted on 1,043 cases and 1,188 controls and a targeted 857-gene panel on the remaining samples. Using ancestry-adjusted SKAT-O analyses, we tested the association of loss of function (LoF) variants with overall, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and ER-negative BC risk. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for BC using ancestry-adjusted logistic regression models. We also tested the association of single variants with BC risk. ResultsWe saw a strong association of LoF variants in FANCM with ER-negative BC (p=4.1x10-7, OR [CI]: 6.7 [2.9-15.6]) and a nominal association with overall BC risk. Among known susceptibility genes, BRCA1 (p=2.3x10-10, OR [CI]: 24.9 [6.1-102.5]), BRCA2 (p=8.4x10-10, OR [CI]: 7.0 [3.5-14.0]), and PALB2 (p=1.8x10-8, OR [CI]: 6.5 [3.2-13.1]) were strongly associated with BC. There were nominally significant associations with CHEK2, RAD51D, and TP53. ConclusionIn H/L women, LoF variants in FANCM were strongly associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk. It previously was proposed as a possible susceptibility gene for ER-negative BC, but is not routinely tested in clinical practice. Our results demonstrate that FANCM should be added to BC gene panels.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
5
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
22
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%