Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists' Use, Attitudes, and Understanding of Genetic Tests in Clinical Practice
Soda, T.; Merner, A. R.; Small, B. J.; Torgerson, L. N.; Munoz, K.; Austin, J.; Storch, E. A.; Pereira, S.; Lazaro-Munoz, G.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo report current practices and attitudes of child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAP) regarding diagnostic genetic and pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing. MethodsSurvey of 958 US-based practicing CAP. Results54.9% of respondents indicated that they had ordered/referred for a genetic test in the past 12 months. 87% of respondents agreed that it is their role to discuss genetic information regarding psychiatric conditions with their patients; however, 45% rated their knowledge of genetic testing practice guidelines as poor/very poor. The most ordered test was PGx (32.2%), followed by chromosomal microarray (23.0%). 73.4% reported that PGx is at least slightly useful in child and adolescent psychiatry. Most (62.8%) were asked by a patient/family to order PGx in the past 12 months and 41.7% reported they would order PGx in response to a family request. Those who ordered a PGx test were more likely to have been asked by a patient/family and to work in private practice. 13.8% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that a PGx test can predict the effectiveness of specific antidepressants. Some respondents also indicated they would make clinical changes based on PGx information even if a medication was currently effective and there were no side effects. ConclusionsGenetic testing has become routine clinical care in child and adolescent psychiatry. Despite this, many providers rate their associated knowledge as poor/very poor. Patient requests were associated with ordering practices and providers misinterpretation of PGx may be leading to unnecessary changes in clinical management. There is need for further education and support for clinicians.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 90%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 90%
- Treatment Resistant Depression in electronic health records: Definitions Matter 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 93%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Adolescents and adults with FOXP1 syndrome show high rates of anxiety and externalizing behaviors but not psychiatric decompensation or skill loss 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Prevalence of Cannabis Use Disorders among U.S. Veterans with and without Psychiatric Disorders Between 2005 and 2019 93%
- Psychiatric comorbidities in substance use disorders: Sex-based differences in a national real-world clinic sample 92%
- Identifying novel subtypes of irritability using a developmental genetic approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 91%
- Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score and 20-Year Course of Illness in Psychotic Disorders 90%
- Metabolic Disturbances, Hemoglobin A1c, and Social Cognition Impairment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: Results from a schizophrenia sample 93%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 91%
- Examining sex differences in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric genetic risk in anxiety and depression 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.