Back

Limited evidence for validity and reliability of non-navigated low and high frequency rTMS over the motor cortex

Kanig, C.; Prei, K.; Osnabruegge, M.; Langguth, B.; Mack, W.; Abdelnaim, M.; Schecklmann, M.; Schoisswohl, S.

2023-01-27 neurology
10.1101/2023.01.24.23284951 medRxiv
Show abstract

The neuromodulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are often described as inhibiting for low frequency and facilitating for high frequency protocols, leading to the lofi-hife heuristic. However, the data basis for this is inconsistent and reliability of rTMS is barely evaluated. The present study examines the validity of this lofi-hife heuristic at group and single subject level and the reliability of rTMS in a non-navigated setting close to clinical application. In 30 healthy participants, 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS were each administered twice over the left motor cortex resulting in four sessions/participant. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before and after each session. Reliability measures were intraclass and Pearsons correlation coefficient (ICC and r). The heuristic was not evident at group level. At single-subject level four participants responded with heuristic-conform changes, i.e., concomitant decreases for 1 Hz and increases for 20 Hz sessions. ICCs and r were low to moderate. Within subgroups of less confounded measures, we found good r values for 20 Hz rTMS. Results demonstrate high inter- and intraindividual variability of rTMS questioning the lofi-hife heuristic. Methodological improvements for the usage of rTMS might help to increase validity and reliability of non-invasive brain stimulation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%