Back

Using Micro-Cognition Biomarkers of Neurosystem Dysfunction to Define ADHD Subtypes: A Scalable Digital Path to Diagnosis Based on Brain Function

Wexler, B. E.; Kish, R.

2023-01-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.01.22.23284871 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDiagnostic categories in psychiatry are based on symptoms and include individuals with different underlying pathology. This within-diagnosis heterogeneity confounds new treatment development and treatment selection for individual patients. A research priority is to discover biomarkers that define groups of patients with similar neuropathology. Digital neurocognitive therapy (DNT) and assessment can provide micro-cognition biomarkers of unprecedented precision. The brain is hierarchically organized from single cells to neurosystems that integrate action of millions of neurons across the brain necessary for cognition and emotion. Micro-cognition biomarkers identify dysfunction at the level of neurosystems that produce clinical illness. We used micro-cognition biomarkers to identify subgroups of children diagnosed with ADHD but with different neuropathology. MethodsK-means clustering was applied to 69 children 6-9 years old with ADHD using performance variables from a Go/NoGo test and the results analyzed against 58 typically developing (TD) children. Neurosystem dysfunction in each group was further characterized by micro-cognition biomarkers extracted from thousands of responses by each child during DNT. FindingsFour highly reproducible clusters were identified that differed on emblematic features of ADHD. Cluster 4 showed two core ADHD features, poor response inhibition and inconsistent attention. Cluster 3 showed only poor response inhibition and the other two showed neither. Cluster 2 showed faster and more consistent responses, higher detection of simple targets and better working memory than TD children but showed the most marked performance decrements when required to track multiple targets or ignore distractors. Cluster 1 showed much greater ability recognizing members of abstract categories rather than natural categories that children learn through physical interaction with the environment while Cluster 4 was the opposite. InterpretationDNT provides data-rich fine-grained, low-cost, noninvasive, and scalable micro-cognition biomarkers that characterize subgroups of patients with the same symptom-based psychiatric diagnosis but differing neuropathology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
4
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
11
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
13
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
28
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%