Back

Assessing treatment effect modification due to comorbidity using individual participant data from industry-sponsored drug trials

Hanlon, P.; Butterly, E.; Shah, A.; Hannigan, L.; Lewsey, J.; Mair, F.; Kent, D.; Guthrie, B.; Wild, S.; Welton, N.; Dias, S.; McAllister, D.

2023-01-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.01.19.23284762 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeople with comorbidities are under-represented in clinical trials. Empirical estimates of treatment effect modification by comorbidity are lacking leading to uncertainty in treatment recommendations. We aimed to produce estimates of treatment effect modification by comorbidity using individual participant data (IPD). Methods and ResultsUsing 126 industry-sponsored phase 3/4 trials across 23 index conditions, we performed a two-stage IPD meta-analysis to estimate modification of treatment effect by comorbidity. We estimated the effect of comorbidity measured in 3 ways: (i) the number of comorbidities (in addition to the index condition), (ii) presence or absence of the six commonest comorbid diseases for each index condition, and (iii) using continuous markers of underlying conditions (e.g., estimated glomerular function). Comorbidities were under-represented in trial participants and few had >2 comorbidities. We found no evidence of modification of treatment efficacy by comorbidity, for any of the 3 measures of comorbidity. This was the case for 20 conditions for which the outcome variable was continuous (e.g., change in glycosylated haemoglobin in diabetes) and for three conditions in which the outcomes were discrete events (e.g., number of headaches in migraine). Although all were null, estimates of treatment effect modification were more precise in some cases (e.g., Sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors for type 2 diabetes - interaction term for comorbidity count 0.004, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.02) while for others credible intervals were wide (e.g., corticosteroids for asthma - interaction term -0.22, 95% CI -1.07 to 0.54). ConclusionFor trials included in this analysis, there was no empirical evidence of treatment effect modification by comorbidity. Our findings support the assumption that estimates of treatment efficacy are constant, at least across modest levels of comorbidity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
3
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
10
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
16
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%