Back

Raman spectroscopy, used trans-cutaneously and non-invasively from a finger, to predict COVID-19: A feasibility, proof-of-concept study.

Chefitz, A. B.; Birch, T.; Yang, Y.; Hussain, A.

2023-01-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.01.19.23284747 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDA definitive COVID-19 infection typically is diagnosed by laboratory tests, including real-time, reverse-transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based testing. These currently available COVID-19 tests require the patient to provide an extra-corporeal specimen and the results may not be immediate. Consequently, a variety of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19, all with a wide range of accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity, has proliferated (1,2). These rapid tests now represent a significantly larger proportion of all testing done for COVID-19, yet suffer from requiring a physical specimen from the nose or mouth and waiting 15 minutes for most. As a solution, we propose a non-invasive, trans-cutaneous, real-time viral detection device, based on the principles of Raman spectroscopy and machine learning. It does not require any extra-corporeal specimens and can be configured for self-administration. It can be easily used by non-experts and does not require medical training. Our approach suggests that our non-invasive, transcutaneous method may be broadly useful not only in COVID-19 diagnosis, but also in other diagnoses. METHODS160 COVID positive (+) patients and 316 COVID negative (-) patients prospectively underwent nasal PCR testing concurrently with testing using our non-invasive, transcutaneous, immediate viral detector. Both the PCR and our experimental viral detector tests were performed side-by-side on outpatients (N=389) as well as inpatients (N= 87) at Holy Name Medical Center in Teaneck, NJ between June 2021 and August, 2022. The spectroscopic data were generated using an 830nm Raman System with SpectraSoft (W2 Innovations)and then, using machine learning, processed to provide an immediate prediction. A unique patient-interface for finger insertion enabled the application of Raman spectroscopy to viral detection in humans. RESULTSThe data analysis algorithm demonstrates that there is an informative Raman spectrum output from the device, and that individual Raman peaks vary between cases and controls. Our proof-of-concept study yields encouraging results, with a specificity for COVID-19 of 0.75, and a sensitivity (including asymptomatic patients) of 0.80. CONCLUSIONSThe combination of Raman spectroscopy, artificial intelligence, and our unique patient-interface admitting only a patient finger achieved test results of 0.75 specificity and 0.80 sensitivity for COVID-19 testing in this first in human proof-of-concept study. More significantly, the predictability improved with increasing data.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
6
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
8
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
10
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%