Nanovirseq: dsRNA sequencing for plant virus and viroid detection by Nanopore sequencing
J. Javaran, V.; Poursalavati, A.; Lemoyne, P.; Ste-Croix, D. T.; Moffett, P.; Fall, M. L.
Show abstract
Worldwide, there is a need for certified clean plant materials to limit viral diseases spread. In order to design a robust and proactive viral-like disease certification, diagnostics, and management program, it is essential to have a fast, inexpensive, and user-friendly tool. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dsRNA-based nanopore sequencing can be a reliable method for the detection of viruses and viroids in grapevines or not. Compared to direct RNA sequencing from rRNA-depleted total RNA (rdTotalRNA), direct-cDNA sequencing from dsRNA (dsRNAcD) yielded more viral reads and detected all grapevine viruses and viroids detected using Illumina MiSeq sequencing (dsRNA-MiSeq). With dsRNAcD sequencing it was possible to detect low abundance viruses (e.g., Grapevine red globe virus) where rdTotalRNA sequencing failed to detect them. Indeed, even after removing rRNA, rdTotalRNA sequencing yielded low viral read numbers. rdTotalRNA sequencing was not sensitive enough to detect all the viruses detected by dsRNA-MiSeq. In addition, there was a false positive identification of a viroid in the rdTotalRNA sequencing that was due to misannotation of a host-driven read. For quick and accurate reads classification, two different taxonomical classification workflows based on protein and nucleotide homology were evaluated in this study, namely DIAMOND&MEGAND (DIA&MEG) and Centrifuge&Recentrifuge (Cent&Rec), respectively. Virome profiles from both workflows were similar except for grapevine endophyte endornavirus (GEEV), which was only detected using DIA&MEG. However, because DIA&MEGs classification is based on protein homology, it cannot detect viroid infection despite giving more robust results. Even though Cent&Recs virus and viroid detection workflow was faster (30 minutes) than DIA&MEGs (two hours), it could not provide the details and information DIA&MEG was able to provide. As demonstrated in our study, nanopore dsRNAcD sequencing and the proposed data analysis workflows are suitable and reliable for viruses and viroids detection, especially in grapevine where viral mixed infection is common.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR/Cas14a Combined with RPA for Visual Detection of Marek's Disease Virus 94%
- Sequencing and variant detection of eight abundant plant-infecting tobamoviruses across Southern California wastewater. 94%
- Leptospira transcriptome sequencing using long-read technology reveals unannotated transcripts and potential polyadenylation of mRNA molecules 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Respiratory Viral Panel: A Diagnostic and Epidemiologic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses. 95%
- The metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in Colorado potato beetle public NGS data 94%
- Metaviromes reveal the dynamics of Pseudomonas host-specific phages cultured and uncultured by plaque assay 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.