Back

Multimodal Data Integration Advances Longitudinal Prediction of the Naturalistic Course of Depression and Reveals a Multimodal Signature of Disease Chronicity

Habets, P. C.; Thomas, R. M.; Milaneschi, Y.; Jansen, R.; Pool, R.; Peyrot, W. J.; Penninx, B. W.; Meijer, O. C.; van Wingen, G. A.; Vinkers, C. H.

2023-01-11 genomics
10.1101/2023.01.10.523383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to individually predict disease course of major depressive disorder (MDD) is essential for optimal treatment planning. Here, we use a data-driven machine learning approach to assess the predictive value of different sets of biological data (whole-blood proteomics, lipid-metabolomics, transcriptomics, genetics), both separately and added to clinical baseline variables, for the longitudinal prediction of 2-year MDD chronicity (defined as presence of MDD diagnosis after 2 years) at the individual subject level. Prediction models were trained and cross-validated in a sample of 643 patients with current MDD (2-year chronicity n = 318) and subsequently tested for performance in 161 MDD individuals (2-year chronicity n = 79). Proteomics data showed best unimodal data predictions (AUROC = 0.68). Adding proteomic to clinical data at baseline significantly improved 2-year MDD chronicity predictions (AUROC = 0.63 vs AUROC = 0.78, p = 0.013), while the addition of other -omics data to clinical data did not yield significantly increased model performance. SHAP and enrichment analysis revealed proteomic analytes involved in inflammatory response and lipid metabolism, with fibrinogen levels showing the highest variable importance, followed by symptom severity. Machine learning models outperformed psychiatrists ability to predict two-year chronicity (balanced accuracy = 71% vs 55%). This study showed the added predictive value of combining proteomic, but not other -omic data, with clinical data. Adding other -omic data to proteomics did not further improve predictions. Our results reveal a novel multimodal signature of MDD chronicity that shows clinical potential for individual MDD disease course predictions from baseline measurements.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.7%
2
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
7
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
10
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
14
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
17
European Neuropsychopharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%