Back

Comparative genomics of smut fungi suggest the ability of meiosis and mating in asexual species of the genus Pseudozyma (Ustilaginales)

Steins, L.; Guerreiro, M. A.; Duhamel, M.; Liu, F.; Wang, Q.-M.; Boekhout, T.; Begerow, D.

2023-01-09 genomics
10.1101/2023.01.09.523226 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Ustilaginales comprise hundreds of plant-parasitic fungi with a characteristic life cycle that directly links sexual reproduction and parasitism: One of the two mating-type loci codes for a transcription factor that not only facilitates mating, but also initiates the infection process. However, several species within the Ustilaginales have no described parasitic stage and were historically assigned to the genus Pseudozyma. Molecular studies have shown that the group is polyphyletic, with members being scattered in various lineages of the Ustilag-inales. Together with recent findings of conserved fungal effectors in these non-parasitic species, this raises the question if parasitism has been lost recently and in multiple independent events or if there are hitherto undescribed parasitic stages of these fungi. ResultsIn this study, we sequenced genomes of five Pseudozyma species together with parasitic species from the Ustilaginales to compare their genomic capability to perform two central functions in sexual reproduction: mating and meiosis. While the loss of sexual capability is assumed in certain lineages and asexual species are common in Asco- and Basidiomycota, we were able to successfully annotate functional mating and meiosis genes that are conserved throughout the whole group. ConclusionOur data suggest that at least the key functions of a sexual lifestyle are maintained in the analyzed genomes, challenging the current understanding of the so-called asexual species with respect to their evolution and ecological role.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%