Meta-evaluation of a whole systems programme, ActEarly: A study protocol
Mansukoski, L.; Lockyer, B.; Creaser, A.; Sheringham, J.; Sheard, L.; Garnett, P.; Yang, T.; Cookson, R.; Albert, A.; Islam, S.; Shore, R.; Khan, A.; Twite, S.; Dawson, T.; Iqbal, H.; Skarda, I.; Villadsen, A.; Asaria, M.; West, J.; Sheldon, T.; Wright, J.; Bryant, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionLiving in an area with high levels of child poverty predisposes children to poorer mental and physical health. ActEarly is a 5-year research programme that comprises a large number of interventions (>20) with citizen science and co-production embedded. It aims to improve the health and well-being of children and families living in two areas of the UK with high levels of deprivation; Bradford in West Yorkshire, and the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. This protocol outlines the meta-evaluation (an evaluation of evaluations) of the ActEarly programme from a systems perspective, where individual interventions are viewed as events in the wider policy system across the two geographical areas. It includes investigating the programmes impact on early life health and well-being outcomes, interdisciplinary prevention research collaboration and capacity building, and local and national decision making. MethodsThe ActEarly meta-evaluation will follow and adapt the five iterative stages of the Evaluation of Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems (ENCOMPASS) framework for evaluation of public health programmes in complex adaptive systems. Theory-based and mixed-methods approaches will be used to investigate the fidelity of the ActEarly research programme, and whether, why and how ActEarly contributes to changes in the policy system, and whether alternative explanations can be ruled out. Ripple effects and systems mapping will be used to explore the relationships between interventions and their outcomes, and the degree to which the ActEarly programme encouraged interdisciplinary and prevention research collaboration as intended. A computer simulation model ("LifeSim") will also be used to evaluate the scale of the potential long-term benefits of cross-sectoral action to tackle the financial, educational and health disadvantages faced by children in Bradford and Tower Hamlets. Together, these approaches will be used to evaluate ActEarlys dynamic programme outputs at different system levels and measure the programmes system changes on early life health and well-being. DiscussionThis meta-evaluation protocol presents our plans for using and adapting the ENCOMPASS-framework to evaluate the system-wide impact of the early life health and well-being programme, ActEarly. Due to the collaborative and non-linear nature of the work, we reserve the option to change and query some of our evaluation choices based on the feedback we receive from stakeholders to ensure that our evaluation remains relevant and fit for purpose.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: Health and Attainment of Pupils in a Primary Education National-Cohort (HAPPEN). A hybrid total population cohort in Wales, UK 96%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 97%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 96%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 97%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 93%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 95%
- A community developed conceptual model for reducing long-term health problems in children with intellectual disability in India 94%
- Community-orientated primary health care: exploring the interface between community health worker programmes, the health system and communities in South Africa 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.