RabbitVar: ultra-fast and accurate somatic small-variant calling on multi-core architectures
Zhang, H.; Song, H.; Yin, Z.; Chang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Niu, B.; Schmidt, B.; Liu, W.
Show abstract
The continuous development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to extensive and frequent use of genomic analysis in cancer research. The associated production of large-scale NGS datasets establishes the need for high-precision somatic variant calling methods that are highly optimized on commonly used hardware platforms. We present RabbitVar (https://github.com/LeiHaoa/RabbitVar), a scalable variant caller that can detect small somatic variants from paired tumor/normal NGS data on modern multi-core CPUs. Our approach combines candidate-finding and machine-learning-based filtering strategies with optimized data structures and multi-threading to achieve both high accuracy and efficiency. We have compared the performance of RabbitVar to leading state-of-the-art callers (Strelka2, Mutect2, NeuSomatic, VarDict, VarScan2) on real-world HCC1395 breast cancer datasets under different sequencing conditions and contamination rates. The evaluation results demonstrate that RabbitVar achieves highly competitive F1-scores when calling SNVs. Moreover, when calling the more challenging indel variants, it consistently achieves the highest F1-scores. RabbitVar is able to process a paired tumor and normal whole human genome sequencing datasets with 80x depth in less than 20 minutes on a 48-core workstation outperforming all other tested variant callers in terms of efficiency.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clair3-Trio: high-performance Nanopore long-read variant calling in family trios with Trio-to-Trio deep neural networks 97%
- DeepSSV: detecting somatic small variants in paired tumor and normal sequencing data with convolutional neural network 96%
- Benchmarking copy number aberrations inference tools using single-cell multi-omics datasets 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.