Back

A simplification of the Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology accurately predicted in-hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study

Roberts, S. B.; Colacci, M. B.; Razak, F.; Verma, A. A.

2023-01-09 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.01.06.23284273 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe simplified and evaluated the Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology (KP method) to predict in-hospital mortality, using open-source tools to measure comorbidity and diagnosis groups, and removing troponin, which is difficult to standardize across clinical assays. Study Design and SettingRetrospective cohort study of adult general medical inpatients at 7 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. ResultsIn 206,155 unique hospitalizations with 6.9% in-hospital mortality, the simplified KP method accurately predicted the risk of mortality. Bias-corrected c-statistics were 0.874 (95%CI 0.872-0.877) with troponin and 0.873 (95%CI 0.871-0.876) without troponin, and calibration was excellent for both approaches. Discrimination and calibration were similar with and without troponin for patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. The Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score (LAPS, a component of the KP method) predicted inpatient mortality on its own with and without troponin with bias-corrected c-statistics of 0.687 (95%CI 0.682-0.692) and 0.680 (95%CI 0.675-0.685), respectively. LAPS was well calibrated, except at very high scores. ConclusionA simplification of the KP method accurately predicted in-hospital mortality risk in an external general medicine cohort. Without troponin, and using common open-source tools, the KP method can be implemented for risk adjustment in a wider range of settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
26.9%
2
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.4%
5
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
10
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
14
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%