A simplification of the Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology accurately predicted in-hospital mortality: A retrospective cohort study
Roberts, S. B.; Colacci, M. B.; Razak, F.; Verma, A. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWe simplified and evaluated the Kaiser Permanente inpatient risk adjustment methodology (KP method) to predict in-hospital mortality, using open-source tools to measure comorbidity and diagnosis groups, and removing troponin, which is difficult to standardize across clinical assays. Study Design and SettingRetrospective cohort study of adult general medical inpatients at 7 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. ResultsIn 206,155 unique hospitalizations with 6.9% in-hospital mortality, the simplified KP method accurately predicted the risk of mortality. Bias-corrected c-statistics were 0.874 (95%CI 0.872-0.877) with troponin and 0.873 (95%CI 0.871-0.876) without troponin, and calibration was excellent for both approaches. Discrimination and calibration were similar with and without troponin for patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction. The Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score (LAPS, a component of the KP method) predicted inpatient mortality on its own with and without troponin with bias-corrected c-statistics of 0.687 (95%CI 0.682-0.692) and 0.680 (95%CI 0.675-0.685), respectively. LAPS was well calibrated, except at very high scores. ConclusionA simplification of the KP method accurately predicted in-hospital mortality risk in an external general medicine cohort. Without troponin, and using common open-source tools, the KP method can be implemented for risk adjustment in a wider range of settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 95%
- Predicting patients with false negative SARS-CoV-2 testing at hospital admission: A retrospective multi-center study 95%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is age the most important risk factor in COVID-19 patients? The relevance of comorbidity burden: A retrospective analysis of 10,090 hospitalizations 92%
- Risk factors for heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction among Medicare beneficiaries: Applications of competing risks analysis and gradient boosted model. 91%
- Sixty-day mortality among 520 Italian hospitalized COVID-19 patients according to the adopted ventilatory strategy in the context of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical organization: a population-based cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the need for escalation of care or death from repeated daily clinical observations and laboratory results in patients with SARS-CoV-2 during 2020: a retrospective population-based cohort study from the United Kingdom 93%
- Healthcare strain and intensive care during the COVID-19 outbreak in the Lombardy region: a retrospective observational study on 43,538 hospitalized patients 91%
- Obtaining prevalence estimates of COVID-19: A model to inform decision-making 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 96%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 95%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of Long COVID among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries using Claims Data 91%
- Using quantitative bias analysis to adjust for misclassification of COVID-19 outcomes: An applied example of inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19 outcomes 90%
- Causal Forests versus Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for Cluster-Level Confounding: A Parametric and Plasmode Simulation Study based on US Hosptial Electronic Health Record Data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.