Patient perspectives and hospital pay-for-performance: A qualitative study from Lebanon
Khalife, J.; Ekman, B.; Ammar, W.; El-Jardali, F.; Al Halabi, A.; Barakat, E.; Emmelin, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient perspectives have received increasing importance within health systems over the past four decades. Measures of patient experience and satisfaction are commonly used. However, these do not capture all the information available through patient engagement. An improved understanding of the various types of patient perspectives and the distinctions between them is needed. The lack of such knowledge limits the usefulness of including patient perspectives as components within pay-for-performance initiatives. This study was aimed to identify and explore patient perspectives on hospital care in Lebanon, and to describe how they relate to the national pay-for-performance initiative. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with persons recently discharged after hospitalization under the coverage of the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health. This study was implemented in 2017 and involved 42 participants across eight focus groups. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the information provided by participants. ResultsFive overall themes supported by 17 categories were identified, capturing the meaning of the informants perspectives: health is everything; being turned into second class citizens; money and wasta (personal connections) make all the difference; wanting to be treated with dignity and respect; and tolerating letdown, for the sake of right treatment. The most frequently prioritized statement in a ranking exercise regarding patient satisfaction was regular contact with ones doctor. ConclusionsPatient perspectives include more than what is traditionally incorporated in measures of patient satisfaction and experience. Patient valuing of health and their perceptions on each of the health system, and access and quality of care should also be taken into account. Hospital pay-for-performance initiatives can be made more responsive through a broader consideration of these perspectives. More broadly, health systems would benefit from wider engagement of patients. We propose a framework relating patient perspectives to value-based healthcare and health system performance.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 96%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 97%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 96%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 96%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 94%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.