Back

Patient perspectives and hospital pay-for-performance: A qualitative study from Lebanon

Khalife, J.; Ekman, B.; Ammar, W.; El-Jardali, F.; Al Halabi, A.; Barakat, E.; Emmelin, M.

2023-01-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.01.06.23284267 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatient perspectives have received increasing importance within health systems over the past four decades. Measures of patient experience and satisfaction are commonly used. However, these do not capture all the information available through patient engagement. An improved understanding of the various types of patient perspectives and the distinctions between them is needed. The lack of such knowledge limits the usefulness of including patient perspectives as components within pay-for-performance initiatives. This study was aimed to identify and explore patient perspectives on hospital care in Lebanon, and to describe how they relate to the national pay-for-performance initiative. MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with persons recently discharged after hospitalization under the coverage of the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health. This study was implemented in 2017 and involved 42 participants across eight focus groups. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the information provided by participants. ResultsFive overall themes supported by 17 categories were identified, capturing the meaning of the informants perspectives: health is everything; being turned into second class citizens; money and wasta (personal connections) make all the difference; wanting to be treated with dignity and respect; and tolerating letdown, for the sake of right treatment. The most frequently prioritized statement in a ranking exercise regarding patient satisfaction was regular contact with ones doctor. ConclusionsPatient perspectives include more than what is traditionally incorporated in measures of patient satisfaction and experience. Patient valuing of health and their perceptions on each of the health system, and access and quality of care should also be taken into account. Hospital pay-for-performance initiatives can be made more responsive through a broader consideration of these perspectives. More broadly, health systems would benefit from wider engagement of patients. We propose a framework relating patient perspectives to value-based healthcare and health system performance.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.