Back

Promoting Sleep Duration in the Pediatric Setting Using a Mobile Health Platform: A Randomized Optimization Trial

Mitchell, J. A.; Morales, K.; Williamson, A.; Jawahar, A.; Juste, L.; Vajravelu, M. E.; Zemel, B.; Dinges, D.; Fiks, A.

2023-01-05 pediatrics
10.1101/2023.01.04.23284151 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDetermine the optimal combination of digital health intervention component settings that increase average sleep duration by [&ge;]30 minutes per weeknight. MethodsOptimization trial using a 25 factorial design. The trial included 2 week run-in, 7 week intervention, and 2 week follow-up periods. Typically developing children aged 9-12y, with weeknight sleep duration <8.5 hours were enrolled (N=97). All received sleep monitoring and performance feedback. The five candidate intervention components (with their settings to which participants were randomized) were: 1) sleep goal (guideline-based or personalized); 2) screen time reduction messaging (inactive or active); 3) daily routine establishing messaging (inactive or active); 4) child-directed loss-framed financial incentive (inactive or active); and 5) caregiver-directed loss-framed financial incentive (inactive or active). The primary outcome was weeknight sleep duration (hours per night). The optimization criterion was: [&ge;]30 minutes average increase in sleep duration on weeknights. ResultsAverage baseline sleep duration was 7.7 hours per night. The highest ranked combination included the core intervention plus the following intervention components: sleep goal (either setting was effective), caregiver-directed loss-framed incentive, messaging to reduce screen time, and messaging to establish daily routines. This combination increased weeknight sleep duration by an average of 39.6 (95% CI: 36.0, 43.1) minutes during the intervention period and by 33.2 (95% CI: 28.9, 37.4) minutes during the follow-up period. ConclusionsOptimal combinations of digital health intervention component settings were identified that effectively increased weeknight sleep duration. This could be a valuable remote patient monitoring approach to treat insufficient sleep in the pediatric setting.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.