Participant Demographics and Testing Trends: A Community Pandemic Response Program
Garcia, Y. E.; Solis, L.; Daza-Torres, M. L.; Montesinos-Lopez, J. C.; Pollock, B. H.; Nuno, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify demographic characteristics of test participants and changes in testing participation over time in a community pandemic-response program launched in a college town in California, USA. MethodsWe described overall testing participation, identified demographic characteristics of frequent testers, and evaluated changes in testing participation over four different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. ResultsA total of 770,165 tests were performed between November 18, 2020, and June 30, 2022, among 89,924 residents of Yolo County (41.1% of population), with significant participation from racially/ethnically diverse participants and across age groups. Most positive cases (49.9%) were captured during Omicron, which also corresponds to the period with the highest daily participation (895 per 100K population). The proportion of participants which we considered "frequent testers" (28.9% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.0001) and individuals that tested once (39.5% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.0001) increased significantly from Delta to Omicron. Women (58.8%), participants of age 19-34 years (38.8%), and White (53.2%) tested more frequently throughout the program. The proportion of tests conducted among Latinos remained steady around 18% over time, with the exception of the post-Omicron period (13%). ConclusionThe unique features of a pandemic response program that supported communitywide access to free asymptomatic testing provides a unique opportunity to evaluate adherence to testing recommendations, and testing trends over time. Identification of individual and group-level factors associated with testing behaviors is essential to improve access and protect communities at-large.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 95%
- Feasibility of an online antigen self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 addressed to health care and education professionals in Catalonia (Spain). The TESTA’T-COVID Project 95%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 94%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 94%
- COVID-19 Prevention at Institutions of Higher Education, United States, 2020 – 2021: Implementation of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 94%
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 94%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies to Estimate Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Texas Vulnerable Population: Results from Phase I of the Texas Coronavirus Antibody REsponse Survey (TX CARES) 95%
- Providing a safe, in-person, residential college experience during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 94%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 93%
- COVID-19 Pandemic among Latinx Farmworker and Non-farmworker Families in North Carolina: Knowledge, Risk Perceptions, and Preventive Behaviors 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.