Qualitative assessment of cryo-EM map reconstruction
Nidamarthi, K. H. V.
Show abstract
With the rapid advancement of Cryo-EM technique in deciphering structural features of biological molecules, it is a necessity to develop and explore different parameters which help us in critical evaluation of different aspects of reconstruction. In this age of ever-increasing automation and number of particles used in reconstruction to achieve high resolution maps, assessment parameters help in validation of reconstruction process. Here, we have employed one such quality parameter which quantitatively assess the presence of non-particles in the reconstructed map.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic insights into the deleterious role of nasu-hakola disease associated TREM2 variants 92%
- Patterns of anisotropic temperature factors in bovine trypsin crystals with and without 0.5 THz irradiation 91%
- In Silico Analysis Predicting Effects of Deleterious SNPs of Human RASSF5 Gene on its Structure and Functions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins 92%
- Designing of a next generation multiepitope based vaccine (MEV) against SARS-COV-2: Immunoinformatics and in silico approaches 92%
- SARS-CoV-2: Proof of recombination between strains and emergence of possibly more virulent ones 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Met58 and di-acidic motif located at C-terminal region of SARS-CoV-2 ORF6 plays a crucial role in its structural conformations 93%
- Inside and outside of virus-like particles HBc and HBc/4M2e: a comprehensive study of the structure 92%
- How the immune mousetrap works: structural evidence for the immunomodulatory action of a peptide from influenza NS1 protein 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.