Back

European Beech Spring Phenological Phase Prediction with UAV-derived Multispectral Indices and Machine Learning Regression

Krause, S. H.; Sanders, T. G.

2022-12-30 ecology
10.1101/2022.12.30.522283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The acquisition of phenological events play an integral part in investigating the effects of climate change on forest dynamics and assessing the potential risk involved with the early onset of young leaves. Large scale mapping of forest phenological timing using earth observation data, could facilitate a better understanding of phenological processes due to an added spatial component. The translation of traditional phenological ground observation data into reliable ground truthing for the purpose of the training and validation of Earth Observation (EO) mapping applications is a challenge. In this study, we explored the possibility of predicting high resolution phenological phase data for European beech (Fagus sylvatica) with the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral indices and machine learning. Using a comprehensive feature selection process, we were able to identify the most effective sensors, vegetations indices, training data partitions, and machine learning models for phenological phase prediction. The best performing model that generalised well over various sites was the model utilising the Green Chromatic Coordinate (GCC) and Generalized Addictive Model (GAM) boosting. The GCC training data was derived from the radiometrically calibrated visual bands from a multispectral sensor and predicted using uncalibrated RGB sensor data. The final GCC/GAM boosting model was capable in predicting phenological phases on unseen datasets within a RMSE threshold of 0.5. This research shows the potential of the interoperability among common UAV-mounted sensors in particular the utility of readily available low cost RGB sensors. Considerable limitations were however discovered with indices implementing the near-infrared (NIR) band due to oversaturation. Future work involves adapting models to facilitate the ICP Forests phenological flushing stages.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
22.1%
2
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
23
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%