On temporal changes in the role of different age groups in propagating the Omicron epidemic waves in England
Goldstein, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is limited information on the role of individuals in different age groups in the spread of infection during the Omicron epidemics, especially ones beyond the winter epidemic wave in 2021-2022. COVID-19 booster vaccination in England during the Autumn 2022 was restricted to persons aged over 50y, and persons in clinical risk groups. MethodsWe used previously developed methodology to evaluate the role of individuals in different age groups in propagating the Spring, Summer, and Autumn waves of the Omicron epidemic in England. This methodology utilizes the relative risk (RR) statistic that measures the change in the proportion of cases in each age group among all COVID-19 cases in the population before the peak of an epidemic wave vs. after the peak of an epidemic wave. Higher values for the RR statistic represent age groups that experienced a disproportionate depletion of susceptible individuals during the ascent of the epidemic (due to increased contact rates and/or susceptibility to infection). ResultsFor the 2022 Spring wave, the highest RR estimate belonged to children aged 5-9y (RR=2.05 (95%CI (2.02,2.08)), followed by children aged 10-14y (RR=1.68 (1.66,1.7)) and children aged 0-4y (RR=1.38 (1.36,1.41)). For the Summer wave, the highest RR estimates belonged to persons aged 20-34y: (RR=1.09 (1.07,1.12) in aged 20-24y, RR=1.09 (1.07,1.11) in aged 25-29y, RR=1.09(1.07,1.11) in aged 30-34y). For the Autumn wave, the highest RR estimates belonged to those aged 70-74y (RR=1.10 (1.07,1.14)), followed by adults aged 35-39y (RR=1.09 (1.06,1.12)), adults aged 40-44y (RR=1.09 (1.06,1.12)), and adults aged 65-69y (RR=1.08 (1.05,1.11)). ConclusionsAs time progressed, the greatest relative roles in propagating different waves of the Omicron epidemic in England shifted from school-age children to younger adults to adults aged 35-44y and 65-74y. Extending booster vaccination to all adults, and possibly to children should help limit the spread of Omicron infections in the community.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave 95%
- The effectiveness of Non Pharmaceutical Interventions in reducing the outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK, an observational and modelling study 93%
- Breakpoint modelling of temporal associations between non-pharmaceutical interventions and the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 in the Republic of Ireland 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstructing the first COVID-19 pandemic wave with minimal data 94%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 94%
- Modeling the early phase of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using a stochastic compartmental model and studying its implied future trajectories 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises 93%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England 92%
- Different approaches to quantify years of life lost from COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.