Back

Genetic subtypes of prediabetes, healthy lifestyle, and risk of type 2 diabetes: Prospective cohort study

Li, Y.; Chen, G.-C.; Moon, J.-Y.; Arthur, R.; Sotres-Alvarez, D.; Daviglus, M. L.; Pirzada, A.; Mattei, J.; Rotter, J. I.; Taylor, K. D.; Chen, Y.-D. I.; Perreira, K.; Smoller, S. W.; Wang, T.; Kaufman, J. D.; Kaplan, R.; Qi, Q.

2022-12-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.12.27.22283972
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo cluster participants with prediabetes with five type 2 diabetes (T2D)-related partitioned polygenetic risk scores (pPRSs) and examine the risk of incident diabetes and the benefit of adherence to healthy lifestyle across clusters. DesignProspective cohort study SettingHispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), US; UK Biobank (UKBB), UK. Participants7,227 US Hispanic/Latinos without diabetes from HCHS/SOL, including 3,677 participants with prediabetes. 400,149 non-Hispanic whites without diabetes from UKBB, including 16,284 participants with prediabetes. Main outcome measuresPrediabetes was defined by fasting plasma glucose (fasting glucose) between 100-125 mg/dL, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT 2h glucose) between 140-199 mg/dL, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between 5.7% and 6.5%. Diabetes was defined by fasting glucose levels [≥]126 mg/dL, 2h glucose after OGTT [≥]200 mg/dL, HbA1c [≥]6.5%, current use of anti-diabetic medications, or medical record. Five pPRSs representing various pathways related to T2D were calculated based on 94 T2D-related genetic variants. Health lifestyle score was assessed with five modifiable risk factors, including body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, and diet for T2D. ResultsUsing K-means consensus clustering on five pRPSs, six clusters of individuals with prediabetes were identified in HCHS/SOL, with each cluster presenting disparate patterns of pPRSs and different patterns of metabolic traits. Except cluster 3 which was not detected, the other five clusters were conformed in participants with prediabetes in UKBB, with each cluster showing the similar patterns of pPRSs to their corresponding cluster in HCHS/SOL. At baseline, proportion of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)/impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and glycemic traits in HCHS/SOL (fasting glucose, OGTT 2h glucose, and HbA1c) were not significantly different across six clusters (P=0.13, P=0.62, P=0.35, P=0.96, respectively). In UKBB, random glucose and HbA1c at baseline did not show significant difference across five clusters (P=0.43, P=0.71, respectively). Although baseline glycemic traits were similar across clusters, cluster 6, which featured a very low proinsulin score, exhibited elevated risk of incident T2D in both cohorts (risk ratio [RR]=1.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=[1.10, 1.76] vs. cluster 1 in HCHS/SOL; hazard ratio [HR]=1.29, 95% CI=[1.00, 1.69] vs. cluster 1 in UKBB; Combined RR/HR=1.34 [1.13, 1.60]). To explain the elevated risk of incident T2D in cluster 6, interactions between proinsulin score and other three pPRSs (Beta-cell score, Lipodystrophy-like score, Liver-lipid score) and sum score were detected (P for interaction=0.001, 0.04, 0.02 and 0.002, respectively). Cluster 5 showed an increased risk of incident T2D in UKBB (HR=1.35 [1.05, 1.75] vs. cluster 1) and in the combined analysis with HCHS/SOL (RR/HR=1.29 [1.08, 1.53]), although its risk of T2D was not significantly different from cluster 1 in HCHS/SOL (RR=1.23 [0.96, 1.57]). Inverse associations between the lifestyle score and risk of T2D were observed across different clusters, with a suggestively stronger association in Cluster 5 compared to Cluster 1, in both cohorts. Cluster 5 showed reduced risk of incident diabetes caused by healthy lifestyle score (RR=0.65 [0.47, 0.89], HR=0.71 [0.62, 0.81], respectively. Combined RR/HR=0.70 [0.62, 0.79]). Among individuals with a healthy lifestyle, those in Cluster 5 had a similar risk of T2D compared to those in Cluster 1 (combined RR/HR=1.03 [0.91-1.18], P>0.05). ConclusionsThis study identified genetic subtypes of prediabetes which differed in risk of progression to T2D, with two subtypes showing relatively high risk of T2D over time. Favorable relationship between healthy lifestyle and risk of T2D was observed, regardless of their genetic subtypes. Participants in one subtype with higher risk of T2D may realize extra benefits in terms of risk reduction from a healthy lifestyle.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.1%
15.6%
2
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 42%
4.6%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 7%
3.0%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 77%
3.0%
7
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
3.0%
8
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 25%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 10%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 15%
1.6%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
15
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
18
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
19
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 20%
0.7%
27
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 7%
0.7%