Back

Induction Of Labour In Spain. A Multicenter Survey

Del Barrio Fernandez, P. G.; Medina Mallen, C.; Alonso Saiz, R.; Alvarez Suberviola, E.; Alvarez Colomo, C.; Batllori Badia, E.; Duenas Carazo, M. B.; Benitez Cano, E.; Bernardo Vega, R.; Boza Novo, P.; Castro Portillo, L.; Comas Rovira, M.; Diaz Meca, L.; Fernandez Fernandez, C.; Fernandez Buhigas, I.; Fernandez Menendez, S.; Garrido Luque, M. B.; Gastaca Abasolo, I.; Llano Fontela, R.; Llordella Sarmiento, I.; Llull Gomila, M.; Lopez Perez, R.; Meca Casbas, M. R.; Munoz Abellana, B.; Munoz Carmona, V.; Orizales Lago, C. M.; Orozco Fernandez, R.; Ortiz Herrera, M. C.; Pena Salas, M. S.; Perez

2022-12-26 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2022.12.23.22283250 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInduction of labour (IDP) is the artificial initiation of labour with the goal of achieving a vaginal delivery. IDP is one of the most frequently performed obstetric procedures in the world. Recent data indicate a highly variable percentage of induction depending on the country. MethodsA descriptive study was carried out on different aspects that are part of the ITP process through a survey prepared according to the Delphi method distributed among the 37 participating hospitals from June to October 2021. ResultsThe mean induction rate was 30.6%. The average rate of caesarean sections was 21.4%. 75% of the centers had a rate higher than 20% and only in 1 center was it lower than 15%. In 11 centers they were not available to use misoprostol and in 4 centers they did not have oxytocin as PDI. Mechanical methods were available in 23 hospitals. In 16 centers they had a double Cook balloon; in 5 they used a Foley catheter and in 2 hospitals they used both devices. In 4 hospitals they used mechanical methods simultaneously with prostaglandins. In all but 5 centers, continuous monitoring was performed in low-risk pregnancies, at least for the first hour. In these 5 centers, windows of 20 minutes were carried out from the start of the induction

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.