Back

Automated Workflow for Instant Labeling and Real-Time Monitoring of Monoclonal Antibody N-Glycosylation

Gyorgypal, A.; Potter, O.; Chaturvedi, A.; Powers, D. N.; Chundawat, S.

2022-12-22 biochemistry
10.1101/2022.12.22.521623 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the transition toward continuous bioprocessing, process analytical technology (PAT) is becoming necessary for rapid and reliable in-process monitoring during biotherapeutics manufacturing. Bioprocess 4.0 is looking to build an end-to-end bioprocesses that includes PAT-enabled real-time process control. This is especially important for drug product quality attributes that can change during bioprocessing, such as protein N-glycosylation, a critical quality attribute for most monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Glycosylation of mAbs is known to influence their efficacy as therapeutics and is regulated for a majority of mAb products on the market today. Currently, there is no method to truly measure N-glycosylation using on-line PAT, hence making it impractical to design upstream process control strategies. We recently described the N-GLYcanyzer: an integrated PAT unit that measures mAb N-glycosylation within 3 hours of automated sampling from a bioreactor. Here, we integrated Agilents Instant PC (IPC) based chemistry workflow into the N-GLYcanzyer PAT unit to allow for nearly 10x faster mAb glycoforms analysis. Our methodology is explained in detail to allow for replication of the PAT workflow as well as present a case study demonstrating use of this PAT to autonomously monitor a mammalian cell perfusion process at the bench-scale to gain increased knowledge of mAb glycosylation dynamics during continuous biomanufacturing of biologics using Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=169 SRC="FIGDIR/small/521623v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (37K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16cf139org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@150db0borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15cbe36org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cbdf6a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.9%
2
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Glycobiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
5
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
8
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.6%
10
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
New Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Nature Protocols
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Bioconjugate Chemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
27
Microbial Cell Factories
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%