Back

HAPNEST: efficient, large-scale generation and evaluation of synthetic datasets for genotypes and phenotypes

Wharrie, S.; Yang, Z.; Raj, V.; Monti, R.; Gupta, R.; Wang, Y.; Martin, A.; O'Connor, L. J.; Kaski, S.; Marttinen, P.; Palamara, P. F.; Lippert, C.; Ganna, A.; INTERVENE Consortium,

2022-12-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.12.22.521552 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Existing methods for simulating synthetic genotype and phenotype datasets have limited scalability, constraining their usability for large-scale analyses. Moreover, a systematic approach for evaluating synthetic data quality and a benchmark synthetic dataset for developing and evaluating methods for polygenic risk scores are lacking. We present HAPNEST, a novel approach for efficiently generating diverse individual-level genotypic and phenotypic data. In comparison to alternative methods, HAPNEST shows faster computational speed and a lower degree of relatedness with reference panels, while generating datasets that preserve key statistical properties of real data. These desirable synthetic data properties enabled us to generate 6.8 million common variants and nine phenotypes with varying degrees of heritability and polygenicity across 1 million individuals. We demonstrate how HAPNEST can facilitate biobank-scale analyses through the comparison of seven methods to generate polygenic risk scoring across multiple ancestry groups and different genetic architectures.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.