It's complicated...: Exploring the missed opportunities and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya
Dickinson, F. M.; Allott, H.; Nyongesa, P.; Eyinde, M.; Muchemi, O. M.; Karangau, S. W.; Ogoti, E.; Shaban, N. A.; Godia, P.; Nyaga, L.; Ameh, C. A.
Show abstract
Unnecessary Caesarean Section (CS) can have adverse effects on women and their newborn. Assisted vaginal birth/delivery (AVB/AVD) using a suction device or obstetric forceps is a potential alternative when delays or complications occur in the second stage of labour. Unlike CS, AVB using a suction device does not require regional or general anaesthesia, can often be performed by midwives, and does not scar the uterus, lowering the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, in this and subsequent pregnancies. This study examined the justification for, and outcomes of second stage CS (SSCS) and reasons for low levels of use of AVB, in Kenya. Using a mixed methods study design, we reviewed case-notes from women having AVB and second-stage CS births, and conducted key informant interviews with healthcare providers, from 8 purposively selected hospitals in Kenya. Randomly selected SSCS and all AVB case-notes were reviewed by a panel of four experienced obstetricians, and appropriateness of the procedure assessed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a thematic approach. Review of 67 SSCS case-notes showed 10% might have been conducted as AVBs, with a further 58% unable to be classified due to inadequate/inconsistent record keeping or excessive delay following initial CS decision. Outcomes following SSCS showed perinatal mortality rate of 89.6/1,000 births, with 11% of infants and 9% of mothers experiencing complications. Non-referred cases of AVB showed good outcomes. Twenty interviews were conducted with obstetricians, medical officers and midwives. The findings explored the experience and confidence of healthcare providers in performing AVBs, and adequacy of the training they received. Key reasons for non-performance included lack of functioning equipment, lack of trained staff or their rotation to other departments. Reasons for non-performance of AVB were complex and often multiple. Any solutions to these problems will need to address various local, regional and national issues.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 97%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 96%
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Giving birth in a Pandemic: Women’s Birth Experiences in England during COVID-19 95%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 95%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 97%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 97%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 96%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.