Genetic Predisposition to High Blood Pressure and Out-of-Office Hypertension: Insights from a Population Sample in Liechtenstein
Narula, S.; Mohammadi-Shemirani, P.; Aeschbacher, S.; Chong, M. R.; Le, A.; Theriault, S.; Grossman, K.; Pare, G.; Risch, L.; Risch, M.; Conen, D.
Show abstract
Genetic predisposition is a risk factor for office hypertension. We tested whether genetic background could identify individuals with ambulatory daytime hypertension in a sample of white Europeans from Liechtenstein. We evaluated two measures of predisposition to hypertension: family history and polygenic risk scores (PRS). Our analytic sample contained 1444 participants aged 25 to 41. Of the participants, 12% had office hypertension, while 37% had out-of-office hypertension. The correlation between blood pressure PRS and family history of hypertension was low (R2 = 4.96x10-3), but both were strongly associated with ambulatory blood pressure (2.2 mmHg per 1 SD increase [95% CI: 1.6, 2.7] & 2.4 mmHg increase with positive family history [95% CI: 1.3, 3.4], respectively). The PRS provides incremental improvement in predicting ambulatory systolic blood pressure beyond a validated blood pressure prediction score ({Delta}AIC = - 33), whereas family history does not ({Delta}AIC = 1). However, the difference in performance between a baseline prediction algorithm for identifying ambulatory systolic daytime hypertension (positive likelihood ratio of 6.87 [95% CI: 5.56, 8.49]; negative likelihood ratio of 0.45 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.51]) and the same model with PRS integrated (positive likelihood ratio of 7.69 [95% CI: 6.18, 9.57]; negative likelihood ratio of 0.43 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.49]) was modest. In conclusion, in a white European sample from Liechtenstein, PRS and family history are distinct constructs that are associated with increased clinical and ambulatory blood pressure. Unlike family history, polygenic risk scores provide incremental information in the identification of individuals with ambulatory hypertension. However, these gains are modest and warrant further development to improve predictive utility at the point-of-care.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 96%
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 95%
- Prediction of Preeclampsia from Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors in Early and Late Pregnancy Using Machine Learning and Polygenic Risk Scores 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences between brachial and aortic blood pressure in adolescence and their impact on classification of hypertension 97%
- Within-visit Blood Pressure Variability in Children and Adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020) 96%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 95%
- Protective lipid-lowering genetic variants in healthy older individuals without coronary heart disease 92%
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.