Back

CT radiomics to predict checkpoint inhibitors treatment outcomes in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma

ter Maat, L. S.; van Duin, I. A. J.; Elias, S. G.; Leiner, T.; Verhoeff, J. J. C.; Arntz, E. R. A. N.; Troenokarso, M. F.; Blokx, W. A. M.; Isgum, I.; de Wit, G. A.; van den Berkmortel, F. W. P. J.; Boers-Sonderen, M. J.; Boomsma, M. F.; van den Eertwegh, A. J. M.; de Groot, J. W. B.; Piersma, D.; Vreugdenhil, A.; Westgeest, H. M.; Kapiteijn, E.; Van Diest, P. J.; Pluim, J. P. W.; De Jong, P. A.; Suijkerbuijk, K. P. M.; Veta, M.

2022-12-20 oncology
10.1101/2022.12.19.22283574 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPredicting checkpoint inhibitors treatment outcomes in melanoma is a relevant task, due to the unpredictable and potentially fatal toxicity and high costs for society. However, accurate biomarkers for treatment outcomes are lacking. Radiomics are a technique to quantitatively capture tumor characteristics on readily available computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of radiomics for predicting durable clinical benefit from checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma in a large, multicenter cohort. MethodsPatients who received first-line anti-PD1 {+/-} anti-CTLA4 treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma were retrospectively identified from nine participating hospitals. For every patient, up to five representative lesions were segmented on baseline CT and radiomics features were extracted. A machine learning pipeline was trained on the radiomics features to predict durable clinical benefit, defined as stable disease for more than six months or response per RECIST 1.1 criteria. This approach was evaluated using a leave-one-center-out cross validation and compared to a model based on previously discovered clinical predictors. Lastly, a combination model was built on the radiomics and clinical model. ResultsA total of 620 patients were included, of which 59.2% experienced durable clinical benefit. The radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.607 [95%CI 0.562-0.652], lower than that of the clinical model (AUROC=0.646 [95%CI 0.600-0.692]). The combination model yielded no improvement over the clinical model in terms of discrimination (AUROC=0.636 [95%CI 0.592-0.680]) or calibration. The output of the radiomics model was significantly correlated with three out of five input variables of the clinical model (p < 0.001). DiscussionThe radiomics model achieved a moderate predictive value of durable clinical benefit, which was statistically significant. However, a radiomics approach was unable to add value to a simpler clinical model, most likely due to the overlap in predictive information learned by both models. Future research should focus on the application of deep learning, spectral CT derived radiomics and a multimodal approach for accurately predicting benefit to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
3
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
8
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
14
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
30
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%