Back

Pregnancy preparation amongst women and their partners in the UK; how common is it and what do people do?

Stewart, C. L.; Hall, J. A.

2022-12-19 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2022.12.19.22283057 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPregnancy preparation, to establish a healthy lifestyle within the preconception period, has been shown to reduce adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite its importance, we know very little about if and how people prepare for pregnancy in the UK. MethodsAs part of the P3 study, women in the UK were invited to complete an online survey about pregnancy preferences, including the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) Scale. 274 participants were currently trying, thinking, or maybe thinking about getting pregnant and were asked about pregnancy preparations. The changes that women, and their partners, made in preparation for pregnancy, reasons for not preparing, and associations with sociodemographics were investigated in univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsOf the 274 women, less than half (n=134, 49%) reported making any changes in preparation for pregnancy, with the most common changes being "eating healthier" (55%) and "folicacid" (54%). The main reason for not preparing was "only thinking about getting pregnant" (38%). 92 women answered questions about partner preparations; only 24% of partners were preparing, with the most common changes being "eating healthier" (64%) and "reducing alcohol" (50%). The main reason for partners not preparing was "already healthy" (51%). DAP score was the only significant factor affecting pregnancy preparation; every one- point increase in DAP score reduced the odds of a woman preparing for pregnancy by 78% (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.15-0.34). ConclusionInterventions addressing pregnancy preparation for women, and their partners, are needed. These strategies should target women thinking about pregnancy, to ensure the full benefits of preconception care are received.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.5%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
19
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%