Back

Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) and RADAR plots for the first episode of major depressive disorder: effects of childhood and recent adverse experiences on suicidal behaviors, neurocognition and phenome features.

Maes, M.; Almulla, A. F.

2022-12-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2022.12.18.22283606 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study was performed to ascertain whether a) a valid precision model and valid Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) scores can be computed in patients experiencing first-episode depression; and b) adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and negative life events (NLEs) are associated with suicidal behavior (SBs), cognitive impairment, and phenome RADAR scores. This study recruited 90 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in an acute phase, of whom 71 showed a first-episode MDD (FEM), and 40 controls. We constructed RADAR scores for ACEs, NLEs encountered the last year, SBs and severity of depression, anxiety, chronic fatigue and physiosomatic symptoms using the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating scales and the Fibro-Fatigue scale. Partial least squares analysis showed that in FEM, one latent vector (labelled the phenome of FEM) could be extracted from depressive, anxiety, fatigue, physiosomatic, melancholia, and insomnia symptoms, SBs, and cognitive impairments. The latter were conceptualized as a latent vector extracted from the Verbal Fluency Test, Mini Mental State Examination, and ratings of memory and judgment, indicating a generalized cognitive decline (G-CoDe). We found that 60.8% of the variance in the FEM phenome was explained by the cumulative effects of NLEs and ACEs, in particular emotional neglect and, to a lesser extent, physical abuse, and by the interaction between ACEs and physical abuse, whereby the latter attenuates the effects of NLEs. In conclusion, not the binary diagnosis of MDD (DSM/ICD) should be used in research and clinical settings but the RADAR scores and plots constructed here.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.7%
2
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
9
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
11
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
13
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
European Neuropsychopharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%