Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) and RADAR plots for the first episode of major depressive disorder: effects of childhood and recent adverse experiences on suicidal behaviors, neurocognition and phenome features.
Maes, M.; Almulla, A. F.
Show abstract
This study was performed to ascertain whether a) a valid precision model and valid Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) scores can be computed in patients experiencing first-episode depression; and b) adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and negative life events (NLEs) are associated with suicidal behavior (SBs), cognitive impairment, and phenome RADAR scores. This study recruited 90 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in an acute phase, of whom 71 showed a first-episode MDD (FEM), and 40 controls. We constructed RADAR scores for ACEs, NLEs encountered the last year, SBs and severity of depression, anxiety, chronic fatigue and physiosomatic symptoms using the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Rating scales and the Fibro-Fatigue scale. Partial least squares analysis showed that in FEM, one latent vector (labelled the phenome of FEM) could be extracted from depressive, anxiety, fatigue, physiosomatic, melancholia, and insomnia symptoms, SBs, and cognitive impairments. The latter were conceptualized as a latent vector extracted from the Verbal Fluency Test, Mini Mental State Examination, and ratings of memory and judgment, indicating a generalized cognitive decline (G-CoDe). We found that 60.8% of the variance in the FEM phenome was explained by the cumulative effects of NLEs and ACEs, in particular emotional neglect and, to a lesser extent, physical abuse, and by the interaction between ACEs and physical abuse, whereby the latter attenuates the effects of NLEs. In conclusion, not the binary diagnosis of MDD (DSM/ICD) should be used in research and clinical settings but the RADAR scores and plots constructed here.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional apathy: A simple and inclusive clinical marker of youth mental health—A longitudinal study 96%
- Strong Genetic Overlaps Between Dimensional and Categorical Models of Bipolar Disorders in a Family Sample 96%
- Validation of the short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in young adulthood 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 95%
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Neuro-transcriptomic signatures for mood disorder morbidity and suicide mortality 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The recurrence of illness (ROI) index is a key factor in major depression that indicates increasing immune-linked neurotoxicity and vulnerability to suicidal behaviors. 97%
- Higher levels of serum IL-1β and TNF-α are associated with an increased probability of major depressive disorder 95%
- A Systematic Review of the Etiology and Neurobiology of Intermittent Explosive Disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 95%
- Depressive disorders are associated with increased peripheral blood cell deformability: A cross-sectional case-control study (Mood-Morph) 94%
- The disappointment centre of the brain gets exciting: A systematic review of habenula dysfunction in depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) for mood disorders, recurrence of illness, suicidal behaviors, and the patient’s lifetime trajectory 99%
- Lowered oxygen saturation and increased body temperature in acute COVID-19 largely predict chronic fatigue syndrome and affective symptoms due to LONG COVID: a precision nomothetic approach 95%
- The use of social media and online dating among individuals with unipolar depression and bipolar disorder 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.