Back

Physiology and mathematical modeling of immobilized Saccharomyces spp. in beer fermentation

Araujo, T. M. d.; Cunha, M. M. L. d.; Barga, M. C.; Della-Bianca, B. E.; Basso, T. O.

2022-12-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.12.17.520861 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is an ever-increasing demand for reduction of unit operations and a growing interest in the physiology of yeasts used in beer fermentation. In this context, cell immobilization is an interesting alternative, since it reduces steps to separate biomass from fermented broth. Yet, physiological alterations in yeast metabolism caused by immobilization are still to be fully described. Thus, the main objective of this work was to evaluate the physiology of three brewers S. cerevisiae yeast strains (SY025, SY067 and SY001) immobilized on a porous cellulose-based support. Batch fermentations in malt extract 12 {degrees}P were carried out for all strains both in free and immobilized forms in order to compare kinetic parameters obtained from distinct process conditions. Mathematical modeling was performed following two viewpoints: modeling of fermentation kinetics by parameter estimation from experimental data and application of a reaction-diffusion model for estimation of substrate concentration gradient inside the immobilization support. Moreover, fermentations with different initial substrate and biomass concentrations were carried out using strain SY025, aiming to evaluate their influence over flavor compounds, using statistical models. Compared to free cells, immobilized yeasts showed both higher glycerol yield (SY025, 40%; SY067, 53%; SY001, 19%) and biomass yield in the system (SY025, 67%; SY067, 78%; SY001, 56%). On the other hand, free cells presented higher ethanol yields when compared to immobilized ones (SY025, 9%; SY067, 9%; and SY001, 13%). According to the model developed, a substrate gradient inside the support was predicted, but with low mass transfer limitations. KEY POINTSO_LIYeast immobilization not always hinder biomass growth, here it was stimulated. C_LIO_LIA classic kinetic model describes accurately immobilized yeast fermentations. C_LIO_LIPhysiology changes occur in immobilization even with low mass transfer limitations. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
2
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Biotechnology for Biofuels
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
22
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
29
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%