Identifying the neurodevelopmental and psychiatric signatures of genomic disorders associated with intellectual disability
Donnelly, N.; Cunningham, A.; Bracher-Smith, M.; Chawner, S.; Stochl, J.; Ford, T.; Raymond, F. L.; Escott-Price, V.; van den Bree, M. B. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionGenomic conditions can be associated with developmental delay, intellectual disability and physical and mental health symptoms, but are individually rare and variable, which limits the use of standard clinical guidelines. A simple screening tool to identify young people with genetic conditions associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (ND-GC) who could benefit from further support would be of considerable value. We used machine learn approaches to address this question. MethodsA total of 489 individuals were included: 376 with a ND-GC, mean age=9.33, 63% male) and 113 unaffected siblings; mean age=10.35, 50% male). Primary carers completed detailed assessments of behavioural, neurodevelopmental and psychiatric symptoms and physical health conditions. Machine learning techniques (elastic net regression, random forests, support vector machines and artificial neural networks) were used to develop classifiers of ND-GC status using a limited set of variables. Exploratory Graph Analysis was used to understand associations within the final variable set. ResultsWe identified a set of 30 variables best discriminating between ND-GC carriers and control individuals, which formed 4 dimensions: Anxiety, Motor Development, Insomnia and Depression. All methods showed high discrimination accuracy with Linear Support Vector machines outperforming other methods (AUROC between 0.959 and 0.971). ConclusionsIn this study we developed models that identified a compact set of psychiatric and physical health measures that differentiate individuals with a ND-GC from controls and highlight the structure within these measures. This work is a step toward developing of a screening instrument to select young people with ND-GCs who might benefit from further specialist assessment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of Inflammation in Depressive and Anxiety Disorders, Affect, and Cognition: Genetic and Non-Genetic Findings in the Lifelines Cohort Study 94%
- Clinical autism subscales have common genetic liability that is heritable, pleiotropic, and generalizable to the general population 93%
- Parsing brain-behavior heterogeneity in very preterm born children using integrated similarity networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Descriptives and genetic correlates of eating disorder diagnostic transitions and presumed remission in the Danish registry 94%
- Investigating direct and indirect genetic effects in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using parent-offspring trios 94%
- Delineating the Genetic Component of Gene Expression in Major Depression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Positive End of the Polygenic Score Distribution for ADHD: A Low Risk or a Protective Factor? 93%
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 92%
- Integrating HiTOP and RDoC Frameworks Part II: Shared and Distinct Biological Mechanisms of Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A significant role for maternal genetic nurture in the risk architecture of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 94%
- The genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder: alleles across the frequency spectrum contribute liability to OCD 93%
- Interplay of ADHD polygenic liability with birth-related, somatic and psychosocial factors in ADHD - a nationwide study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.