Effectiveness of community non-pharmacological interventions for mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review of economic evaluations and a review of reviews
Eaglestone, G.; Gkaintatzi, E.; Stoner, C.; Pacella, R.; McCrone, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundDementia prevalence is increasing with no cure at present. Drug therapies have limited efficacy and potential side effects. People with dementia are often offered non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life and relieve symptoms. Identifying which interventions are cost-effective is important due to finite resources in healthcare services. AimsTo review published economic evaluations of community non-pharmacological interventions for people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and assess usefulness for decision making in health services. MethodsSystematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021252999) included economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions for dementia or mild cognitive impairment with a narrative approach to data synthesis. Exclusions: interventions for dementia prevention/early detection or end of life care. Databases searched: Academic search premier, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Psychology and behavioural sciences collection, PsycArticles, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Business Source Premier and Regional Business News; timeframe 01 January 2011 to 30 June 2021 (13 September 2021 for Embase). Study quality assessed using CHEERS. ResultsIncluded thirty-two studies and five reviews, evaluating community dementia interventions worldwide across several distinct forms of care: physical activity, cognition, training, multi-disciplinary interventions and other (telecare/assistive technology, specialist dementia care, group living, home care versus care home). No single intervention was shown to be cost-effective across all economic evaluations. ConclusionMore economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of specific dementia care interventions is needed, with consistency around measurement of costs and outcomes data. Better information and higher-quality studies could improve decision makers confidence to promote future cost-effective dementia interventions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 95%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 95%
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 93%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in real world dementia risk profiles in 6171 adults drawn from the Australian CogDrisk website according to demographic characteristics 92%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 88%
- COVID19-related and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older adults across the first epidemic wave of SARS-COV-2 infection in the region of Tarragona, Spain: results from the COVID19 TARRACO Cohort Study, March-June 2020 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- New IPECAD open-source model framework for the health technology assessment of early Alzheimer’s disease treatment: development and use cases 92%
- Validity, Reliability, and Framing Effects in Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off Studies: A Systematic Review 87%
- Developing Meaningful Score Differences for the Bayley-4 and Vineland-3 in Angelman Syndrome using a Delphi Panel 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 95%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 92%
- Sativex (Nabiximols) for the treatment of Agitation & Aggression in Alzheimer’s Dementia in UK nursing homes (STAND): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.