Neuropsychiatric Disorder Subtyping Via Clustered Deep Learning Classifier Explanations
Ellis, C. A.; Miller, R. L.; Calhoun, V. D.
Show abstract
Identifying subtypes of neuropsychiatric disorders based on characteristics of their brain activity has tremendous potential to contribute to a better understanding of those disorders and to the development of new diagnostic and personalized treatment approaches. Many studies focused on neuropsychiatric disorders examine the interaction of brain networks over time using dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) extracted from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Some of these studies involve the use of either deep learning classifiers or traditional clustering approaches, but usually not both. In this study, we present a novel approach for subtyping individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders within the context of schizophrenia (SZ). We train an explainable deep learning classifier to differentiate between dFNC data from individuals with SZ and controls, obtaining a test accuracy of 79%. We next make use of cross-validation to obtain robust average explanations for SZ training participants across folds, identifying 5 SZ subtypes that each differ from controls in a distinct manner and that have different degrees of symptom severity. These subtypes specifically differ from one another in their interaction between the visual network and the subcortical, sensorimotor, and auditory networks and between the cerebellar network and the cognitive control and subcortical networks. Additionally, there are statistically significant differences in negative symptom scores between the subtypes. It is our hope that the proposed novel subtyping approach will contribute to the improved understanding and characterization of SZ and other neuropsychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 4D Dynamic Spatial Brain Networks At Rest Linked To Cognition Show Atypical Variability And Coupling In Schizophrenia 96%
- A Multimodal Vision Transformer for InterpretableFusion of Functional and Structural NeuroimagingData 95%
- Static and Dynamic Cross-Network Functional Connectivity Shows Elevated Entropy in Schizophrenia Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterising grey-white matter relationships in recent-onset psychosis and its association with cognitive function 93%
- A Fundamental Distinction in Early Neural Processing of Implicit Social Interpretation in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder 92%
- Modality-specific dysfunctional neural processing of social-abstract and non-social-concrete information in schizophrenia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable Fuzzy Clustering Framework Reveals Divergent Default Mode Network Connectivity Dynamics in Schizophrenia 97%
- Bridging Structural MRI with Cognitive Function for Individual Level Classification of Early Psychosis via Deep Learning 95%
- Altered Temporal Variability of Local and Large-scale Resting-state Brain Functional Connectivity Patterns in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing Inaccurate Nosology in Mental Health: A Multi Label Data Cleansing Approach for Detecting Label Noise from Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in Mood and Psychosis Disorders 94%
- Unraveling the Neural Landscape of Mental Disorders using Double Functional Independent Primitives (dFIPs) 94%
- Default Mode Network Hypoalignment of Function to Structure Correlates with Depression and Rumination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 93%
- White Matter Microstructure Alterations and Their Link to Symptomatology in Early Psychosis and Schizophrenia 92%
- Electrophysiological network alterations in adults with copy number variants associated with high neurodevelopmental risk 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.