Back

Vaporous essential oils and isolates restore pyrethroid-treated netting efficacy to Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

Rault, L. C.; O'Neal, S. T.; Johnson, E. J.; Anderson, T. D.

2022-12-15 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.12.13.520257 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Decreasing opportunities for mosquitoes to bite is critical in the reduction of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission, such as Plasmodium spp. or dengue, yellow fever, and West Nile viruses. Field-evolved resistance to a large selection of synthetic insecticides is crippling efforts to reduce mosquito populations and new strategies are necessary to sustain the efficacy of commercially available tools. Aedes aegypti (L.), among other species, have evolved pyrethroid resistance in the field and the pyrethroid-resistant Puerto Rico (PR) strain is a valuable tool for understanding resistance mechanisms. A previous study showed that pyrethroid efficacy can be enhanced by pre-exposing the PR strain to essential oil vapors before topical application of deltamethrin. Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are current products commercialized for mosquito bite protection, but nets using pyrethroids are losing efficacy in the field due to field-evolved pyrethroid resistance. This study tested essential oils previously identified to affect pyrethroid efficacy, as well as their main isolates, to assess if they can restore the efficacy of pyrethroid-treated LLIN against the PR strain. We show that although amyris (Amyris balsamifera) expectedly decreases net efficacy, increased mortality can be obtained after exposure to tagetes (Tagetes bipinnata) and cajeput (Melaleuca cajuputi) oils, but also after exposure to their isolates, such as dihydro tagetone and ocimene, from 1 h after exposure to the net. This study provides a selection of promising synergists used as vaporous emanations to restore pyrethroid efficacy and counteract field-evolved resistance in mosquitoes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.