Laboratory-Developed Test Orders in an Academic Health System
Rychert, J.; Schmidt, R. L.; Genzen, J. R.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development Act, if enacted, would create a unified regulatory oversight system for all in vitro clinical tests, including laboratory-developed tests. ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of use of laboratory-developed tests in an academic medical center system. DesignQuality improvement study analyzing 2021 test order data. SettingAcademic medical center (hospital, outpatient clinics, and cancer center) and non-profit national reference laboratory. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Main outcome, not applicable; non-interventional study of retrospective data. Measures include assay type, assay methodology, compliance status (i.e., Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assay, laboratory-developed test, and standard method), test order volume, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and provider medical specialty. ResultsOf the 3,016,928 tests ordered in 2021, 2,831,489 (93.9%) were Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assays, 116,583 (3.9%) were laboratory-developed tests, and 68,856 (2.3%) were standard methods. Laboratory-developed tests were more commonly ordered in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and represented a higher proportion of the test volume at the cancer center compared to University Hospital (5.6% vs 3.6% respectively). The top 167 laboratory-developed test assays accounted for 90% of the laboratory-developed test volume (104,996 orders). Among the 20 most frequently ordered laboratory-developed tests were mass spectrometry assays and tests used in the care of immunocompromised patients. Internal/family medicine placed the greatest number of orders (1,044,642) and ordered one of the lowest proportions of laboratory-developed tests (3.2%). Non-infectious disease molecular testing made up 8.8% of laboratory-developed tests ordered. ConclusionsLaboratory-developed tests made up a small percentage of the total laboratory tests ordered within the academic health system studied. Regulatory reform proposals should consider the need for both safety and availability of laboratory-developed tests in clinical laboratory settings. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow frequently are laboratory developed tests (LDTs) used in an academic medical center (AMC) setting? FindingsIn this quality improvement study looking at test orders in 2021, 93.9% of test orders were for FDA cleared, approved, or authorized assays, 3.9% were for LDTs, and 2.3% were for standard methods. The top 167 LDT assays accounted for 90% of the LTD volume. MeaningIn vitro diagnostic reform efforts will impact many LDTs assays with relatively low order volumes in AMC settings.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 94%
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 94%
- Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test performance compared to PCR-based testing and versus the Sofia 2 SARS Antigen point-of-care test. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended Storage of SARS-CoV2 Nasopharyngeal Swabs Does Not Negatively Impact Results of Molecular-Based Testing 92%
- Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach 92%
- Molecular point-of-care testing for influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus: comparison of workflow parameters for the ID Now and cobas Liat systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid implementation of SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization RT-PCR testing and experience at an academic medical institution 92%
- Variant Scientists in Genomic Medicine: Survey of Demographics, Training, Duties, and Professional Development 91%
- Two Stage Hierarchical Group Testing Strategy to Increase SARS-CoV-2 Testing Capacity at an Institution of Higher Education: A Retrospective Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 89%
- Artificial Intelligence for Advance Requesting of Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostically Uncertain Prostate Biopsies 87%
- Clonal evaluation of prostate cancer molecular heterogeneity in biopsy samples by dual immunohistochemistry and dual RNA in situ hybridization 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical application of ISO and CEN/TS standards for liquid biopsies - information everybody wants but nobody wants to pay for 92%
- Patient DNA cross-reactivity of the CDC SARS-CoV-2 extraction control leads to an inherent potential for false negative results 90%
- Association between neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and commercial serological assays 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.