Back

Laboratory-Developed Test Orders in an Academic Health System

Rychert, J.; Schmidt, R. L.; Genzen, J. R.

2022-12-13 pathology
10.1101/2022.12.12.22283358 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development Act, if enacted, would create a unified regulatory oversight system for all in vitro clinical tests, including laboratory-developed tests. ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of use of laboratory-developed tests in an academic medical center system. DesignQuality improvement study analyzing 2021 test order data. SettingAcademic medical center (hospital, outpatient clinics, and cancer center) and non-profit national reference laboratory. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Main outcome, not applicable; non-interventional study of retrospective data. Measures include assay type, assay methodology, compliance status (i.e., Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assay, laboratory-developed test, and standard method), test order volume, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and provider medical specialty. ResultsOf the 3,016,928 tests ordered in 2021, 2,831,489 (93.9%) were Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assays, 116,583 (3.9%) were laboratory-developed tests, and 68,856 (2.3%) were standard methods. Laboratory-developed tests were more commonly ordered in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and represented a higher proportion of the test volume at the cancer center compared to University Hospital (5.6% vs 3.6% respectively). The top 167 laboratory-developed test assays accounted for 90% of the laboratory-developed test volume (104,996 orders). Among the 20 most frequently ordered laboratory-developed tests were mass spectrometry assays and tests used in the care of immunocompromised patients. Internal/family medicine placed the greatest number of orders (1,044,642) and ordered one of the lowest proportions of laboratory-developed tests (3.2%). Non-infectious disease molecular testing made up 8.8% of laboratory-developed tests ordered. ConclusionsLaboratory-developed tests made up a small percentage of the total laboratory tests ordered within the academic health system studied. Regulatory reform proposals should consider the need for both safety and availability of laboratory-developed tests in clinical laboratory settings. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow frequently are laboratory developed tests (LDTs) used in an academic medical center (AMC) setting? FindingsIn this quality improvement study looking at test orders in 2021, 93.9% of test orders were for FDA cleared, approved, or authorized assays, 3.9% were for LDTs, and 2.3% were for standard methods. The top 167 LDT assays accounted for 90% of the LTD volume. MeaningIn vitro diagnostic reform efforts will impact many LDTs assays with relatively low order volumes in AMC settings.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
8
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
9
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
12
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%