Back

Laboratory-Developed Test Orders in an Academic Health System

Rychert, J.; Schmidt, R. L.; Genzen, J. R.

2022-12-13 pathology
10.1101/2022.12.12.22283358 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development Act, if enacted, would create a unified regulatory oversight system for all in vitro clinical tests, including laboratory-developed tests. ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of use of laboratory-developed tests in an academic medical center system. DesignQuality improvement study analyzing 2021 test order data. SettingAcademic medical center (hospital, outpatient clinics, and cancer center) and non-profit national reference laboratory. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Main outcome, not applicable; non-interventional study of retrospective data. Measures include assay type, assay methodology, compliance status (i.e., Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assay, laboratory-developed test, and standard method), test order volume, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and provider medical specialty. ResultsOf the 3,016,928 tests ordered in 2021, 2,831,489 (93.9%) were Food and Drug Administration cleared, approved, and/or authorized assays, 116,583 (3.9%) were laboratory-developed tests, and 68,856 (2.3%) were standard methods. Laboratory-developed tests were more commonly ordered in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and represented a higher proportion of the test volume at the cancer center compared to University Hospital (5.6% vs 3.6% respectively). The top 167 laboratory-developed test assays accounted for 90% of the laboratory-developed test volume (104,996 orders). Among the 20 most frequently ordered laboratory-developed tests were mass spectrometry assays and tests used in the care of immunocompromised patients. Internal/family medicine placed the greatest number of orders (1,044,642) and ordered one of the lowest proportions of laboratory-developed tests (3.2%). Non-infectious disease molecular testing made up 8.8% of laboratory-developed tests ordered. ConclusionsLaboratory-developed tests made up a small percentage of the total laboratory tests ordered within the academic health system studied. Regulatory reform proposals should consider the need for both safety and availability of laboratory-developed tests in clinical laboratory settings. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow frequently are laboratory developed tests (LDTs) used in an academic medical center (AMC) setting? FindingsIn this quality improvement study looking at test orders in 2021, 93.9% of test orders were for FDA cleared, approved, or authorized assays, 3.9% were for LDTs, and 2.3% were for standard methods. The top 167 LDT assays accounted for 90% of the LTD volume. MeaningIn vitro diagnostic reform efforts will impact many LDTs assays with relatively low order volumes in AMC settings.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.