Back

Multiple GC-biased repetitive ITS copies in the Hirsutella sinensis genome are not generated by RIP mutagenesis involving transition point mutations

Li, X.-Z.; Li, Y.-l.; Wang, Y.-N.; Zhu, J.-S.

2022-12-10 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.12.09.519819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

It has been hypothesized that AT-biased genotypes of Ophiocordyceps sinensis are generated through repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) and coexist as permanently nonfunctional internal transcribed spacer (ITS) pseudogenes in the genome of Hirsutella sinensis (GC-biased Genotype #1 of O. sinensis). This study examined the H. sinensis genome, which contains multiple repetitive ITS copies (GC content: 64.7{+/-}0.33%) with multiple insertion/deletion and transversion alleles, which were not generated through RIP mutagenesis that theoretically causes cytosine-to-thymine (C-to-T) and guanine-to-adenine (G-to-A) transitions. The repetitive ITS copies in the H. sinensis genome were found to be genetically and phylogenetically distinct from the AT-biased O. sinensis genotypes (GC content: 51.1{+/-}1.69%), which possess multiple transition alleles. The sequences of Genotypes #2-17, both GC- and AT-biased, are absent from the H. sinensis genome; these genotypes belong to interindividual O. sinensis fungi and differentially occur in different compartments of natural Cordyceps sinensis, with dynamic alterations in abundance occurring in an asynchronous, disproportional manner during C. sinensis maturation. Metatranscriptomic analyses of natural C. sinensis revealed the transcriptional silencing of 5.8S genes in all C. sinensis- colonizing fungi, including H. sinensis. The transcription assay reported by Li et al. [1] provided unsound, controversial evidence indicating that the 5.8S genes of AT-biased genotypes are nonfunctional pseudogenes. In addition to the single ITS locus analysis, repetitive genomic copies were also examined at multiple loci in the H. sinensis genome, and approximately 8.2% of the authentic genes had repetitive copies, including various transitions, transversions, and insertions/deletions. The transcripts for the repetitive copies, regardless of the decreases, increases, or bidirectional changes in the AT content, were identified in the H. sinensis transcriptome. These results are inconsistent with those of RIP mutagenesis, which generates pseudogenic, nonfunctional, repetitive copies. In conclusion, AT-biased genotypes of O. sinensis might have evolved through evolutionary mechanisms from a common ancestor over the long course of evolution, in parallel with GC-biased Genotype #1 H. sinensis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.7%
2
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
4
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
6
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
11
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%