User and Usability Testing of a web-based GBA and LRRK2 genetics education tool
Han, N. A.; Paul, R. A.; Bardakjian, T.; Kargilis, D.; Bradbury, A. R.; Chen-Plotkin, A.; Tropea, T. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundGenetic testing is essential to identify research participants for clinical trials enrolling people with Parkinsons disease (PD) carrying a variant in the GBA or LRRK2 genes. Limited availability of professionals trained in genetic counseling is a major barrier to increased testing. ObjectiveAs an alternative to pre-test genetic counseling, we developed a web-based genetics education tool focused on GBA and LRRK2 testing for PD called the Interactive Multimedia Approach to Genetic counseling to INform and Educate in PD (IMAGINE-PD) and conducted user testing and usability testing. MethodsGenetic counselors and PD and neurogenetics subject matter experts developed content for IMAGINE-PD, specifically focused on GBA and LRRK2 genetic testing. User testing to review content was conducted with thirteen patients with PD and eleven movement disorder specialists (MDS). Twelve PD patients were enrolled in usability testing of a high-fidelity prototype in accordance with national guidelines. Qualitative data analysis was used in both phases. ResultsQualitative analysis conducted by three evaluators identified themes emerging from MDS and PD patient feedback in user testing in three content areas: content, function, and appearance. Similarly, qualitative analysis of usability testing feedback identified additional themes in these three content areas. Refinements were made to IMAGINE-PD based on consensus recommendation by evaluators. ConclusionsUser testing for content review and usability testing have informed refinements to IMAGINE-PD to develop this alternative to standard pre-test genetic counseling. Comparison of this stakeholder-informed intervention to standard telegenetic counseling approaches is ongoing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Guided Precision Medicine Clinical Decision Support Tools: A Systematic Review 92%
- Measuring Quality-of-Care in Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Novel Application of Natural Language Processing 91%
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 91%
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 90%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a knowledge translation platform for ataxia: Impact on readers and volunteer contributors 94%
- Investigating the impact of physical activity on mitochondrial function in Parkinson's disease (PARKEX): Study protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial 92%
- “…but I know something’s not right here”: Exploring the diagnosis and disclosure experiences of persons living with ALS 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 91%
- The Australian Parkinson’s Genetics Study (APGS) - pilot (N = 1,532) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.