A hostile context, very limited intervention theory and almost no change in outcomes: findings from a realist review of health passports for Autistic adults
Ellis, R.; Williams, K.; Brown, A.; Healer, E.; Grant, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundAutism is a normal part of cognitive diversity, resulting in communication and sensory processing differences, which can become disabling in a neurotypical world. Autistic people have an increased likelihood of physical and mental co-occurring conditions and die earlier than neurotypical peers. Inaccessible healthcare may contribute to this. Autism Health Passports (AHPs) are paper-based or digital tools which can be used to describe healthcare accessibility needs; they are recommended in UK clinical guidance. However, questions remained as to the theoretical underpinnings and effectiveness of AHPs. MethodsWe undertook a systematic literature search identifying studies focused on AHPs for adults (aged over 16 years) from five databases. Included literature was subjected to realist evaluation. Data were extracted using a standardised form, developed by the research team, which considered research design, study quality for realist review and the Context, Mechanisms and Outcomes (CMOs) associated with each AHP tool. Findings162 unique records were identified, and 13 items were included in the review. Only one item was considered high quality. Contextual factors focused on the inaccessibility of healthcare to Autistic patients and staff lack of confidence and training in supporting Autistic needs. Interventions were heterogeneous, with most sources reporting few details as to how they had been developed. The most frequently included contents were communication preferences. Mechanisms were often not stated or were inferred by the reviewers and lacked specificity. Outcomes were included in four studies and were primarily focused on AHP uptake, rather than Outcomes which measured impact. ConclusionThere is insufficient evidence to conclude that AHPs reduce the health inequalities experienced by Autistic people. Using an AHP tool alone, without the inclusion of the local Autistic community developing the tool, and a wider intervention, such as training for staff or the use of local champions, may mean that AHPs do not trigger any Mechanisms, and thus cannot affect Outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Autism Caregiver Coaching in Africa (ACACIA): Protocol for a type 1-hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial 95%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 93%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 93%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 93%
- The COVID-19 pandemic impact on continuity of care provision on rare brain diseases and on Ataxia, Dystonia and PKU. A scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 93%
- Evaluation on the Effectiveness on the Implementation of WHO-CST Programme in Hong Kong: A RCT Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 92%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
- Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.