Back

Ascending and Descending Aortic ECM Hydrogels for Modeling Aortic Wall Biology

Lee, Y. C.; Richards, T. D.; Fantini, D. A.; Kaczorowski, D. J.; Brown, B. N.; Phillippi, J. A.

2022-12-05 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.12.03.518904 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although in vitro modeling systems are becoming increasingly advanced, the complex pathophysiology of aortic diseases remains a challenge to mimic and adequately replicate. Biomechanical weakening of the vessel wall, medial degeneration and remodeling are all hallmarks of aneurysmal diseases via incompletely understood mechanisms. Understanding what factors disrupt the multi-layer biology of large blood vessels during the progression of aneurysmal disease can aid in the unmet clinical need to slow or halt disease progression. In particular, the microvascular network of the vasa vasorum provides the primary blood supply to the outer aortic wall and is a key component of inter-layer vascular health. Different origins of the vasa vasorum correspond to the anatomically specific functions of the aortic regions, which can further pertain to the differing origins of vascular wall cells and putative differences in the composition of extracellular matrix (ECM). Biologic scaffolds produced from ECM are useful biomaterials to understand biological processes and address wound healing, stem cell differentiation, and angiogenesis for both in vitro and in vivo disease models. In the present study, we investigated putative differences in composition and structure between ascending and descending aorta-derived ECM to better understand intra- and inter-layer cell-matrix interactions relevant to vasa vasorum function in the aorta. Ascending and descending aortic ECM (AECM) hydrogels were shown to retain bioactivity and influence contractility of human vasa vasorum-associated pericytes. A comprehensive understanding of the effect of layer-specific ECM on cells in different aortic regions could help uncover novel disease mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
7
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%