Back

A knowledge-based system for personalised lifestyle recommendations: Design and simulation of potential effectiveness on the UK Biobank data

Cavallo, F. R.; Toumazou, C.

2022-12-05 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.12.02.518736 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mobile health applications, which employ wireless technology for healthcare, can aid behaviour change and subsequently improve health outcomes. Mobile health applications have been developed to increase physical activity, but are rarely grounded on behavioural theory and employ simple techniques for personalisation, which has been proven effective in promoting behaviour change. In this work, we propose a theoretically driven and personalised behavioural intervention delivered through an adaptive knowledge-based system. The behavioural system design is guided by the Behavioural Change Wheel and the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation behavioural model. The system exploits the ever-increasing availability of health data from wearable devices, point-of-care tests and consumer genetic tests to issue highly personalised physical activity and sedentary behaviour recommendations. To provide the personalised recommendations, the system firstly classifies the user into one of four diabetes clusters based on their cardiometabolic profile. Secondly, it recommends activity levels based on their genotype and past activity history, and finally, it presents the user with their current risk of developing cardiovascular disease. In addition, leptin, a hormone involved in metabolism, is included as a feedback biosignal to personalise the recommendations further. As a case study, we designed and demonstrated the system on people with type 2 diabetes, since it is a chronic condition often managed through lifestyle changes, such as physical activity increase and sedentary behaviour reduction. We trained and simulated the system using data from diabetic participants of the UK Biobank, a large-scale clinical database, and demonstrate that the system could help increase activity over time. These results warrant a real-life implementation of the system, which we aim to evaluate through human intervention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.8%
3
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
21
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%