Back

Associations between area-level health-related social factor indices and risk of acute COVID-19: An EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program

Chisolm, D. J.; Webb, R.; Salamon, K.; Schuchard, J.; Mendonca, E.; Sills, M.; Patel, P.; Musante, J.; Forrest, C. B.; Jhaveri, R.; Pajor, N. M.; Rao, S.; Mejias, A.; Lee, G. M.

2022-12-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.12.02.22282944 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundResearch demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) among adults disproportionately impacts racial and ethnic minorities and those living in lower-income communities. Similar research in children is limited due, in part, to the relatively low COVID-19 incidence in children compared to adults. This analysis, conducted as part of the RECOVER Initiative, explores this question. MethodsElectronic health record (EHR) data from PEDSnet, a multi-institutional research network of pediatric healthcare organizations, were geocoded and linked to two indices of contextual social deprivation: the Area Deprivation Index and the Child Opportunity Index. Univariate statistics were employed to test the association between each index and COVID19 positivity among children ages 0-20 tested at one of six Childrens hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between these social context indices and racial disparities in positivity, controlling co-variates. ResultsBoth ADI and COI were significantly associated with COVID-19 positivity in univariate and adjusted models, particularly in the pre-delta and delta variant waves. ADI showed a stronger association. Higher rates of positivity were found for non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial children compared to non-Hispanic White children. These racial disparities remained significant after control for either index and for other variables. ConclusionADI and COI are significantly associated with COVID-19 test positivity in a population of children and adolescents tested in childrens hospital settings. These social contextual variables do not fully explain racial disparities, arguing that racial disparities are not solely a reflection of socioeconomic status. Future disparities research should consider both race and social context.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.