A machine learning model to explore individual risk factors for tuberculosis treatment non-adherence in Mukono district
Gichuhi, H. W.; Magumba, M.; Kumar, M.; Mayega, R. W.
Show abstract
Despite the availability and implementation of well-known efficacious interventions for Tuberculosis (TB) prevention and treatment by the Ministry of Health, Uganda (MoH), treatment non-adherence persists. Moreover, identifying a specific patient at risk of non-adherence is still a challenge. Thus, this study set out to utilize machine learning modeling to explore individual risk factors predictive of tuberculosis treatment non-adherence in the Mukono district. This was a retrospective study based on a record review of 838 TB patients enrolled in six health facilities (3 government, 3 private-not-for-profit) in the Mukono district. We developed five machine learning algorithms (Logistic regression (LR), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and AdaBoost) to explore the individual risk factors for tuberculosis treatment non-adherence. Also, we evaluated their accuracy by computing the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) through the aid of a confusion matrix. Of the five developed and evaluated models, SVM performed the best with an accuracy of 91.28 % compared to RF (89.97%), LR (88.30%), ANN (88.30%), and AdaBoost (91.05%) respectively. Individual risk factors predictive of non-adherence included; TB type, GeneXpert results, sub-country, ART status, contacts below 5 years, health facility ownership, sputum test results at 2 months, treatment supporter, CPT Dapson status, risk group, patient age, gender, middle and upper arm circumference, referral, positive sputum test at 5 months and 6 months. This study shows that classification machine learning techniques can identify patient factors predictive of treatment non-adherence and accurately differentiate between adherent and non-adherent patients. Thus, TB program management should consider adopting the machine learning techniques evaluated in this study as a screening tool for both identity and target-suited interventions for these patients.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 96%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 94%
- Geographical validation of the Smart Triage Model by age group 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting False Negative IGRA Results in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Using Propensity Score Matching 95%
- Isoniazid preventive therapy completion and factors associated with non-completion among patients on antiretroviral therapy at Kisenyi Health Centre IV, Kampala, Uganda 95%
- Adherence trajectory as an on-treatment risk indicator among drug-resistant TB patients in the Philippines 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment preferences among people at risk of developing tuberculosis: a discrete choice experiment 96%
- Healthcare seeking behavior and delays in case of drug-resistant Tuberculosis patients in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey 95%
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.